Interference and the representation of events in memory
- PMID: 1834768
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.855
Interference and the representation of events in memory
Abstract
Most current models of memory predict that the presence of increasingly well-learned, or strong, items in memory will cause increasing interference. This phenomenon, the list-strength effect, occurs as predicted when memory is tested by free recall but not when a recognition test is used. Four experiments use end-of-session testing to demonstrate that redistribution of storage time or effort from strong to weak items on mixed lists does not occur and therefore cannot be masking interference by strong items. Delay between study and test is found to cause memory loss independent of the basic list-strength findings. It is concluded that the presence of strong items in memory does not interfere with recognition performance and that interference is due to failures of retrieval rather than to composition or other forms of destructive interaction during storage.
Similar articles
-
Interference from retrieval cues in Parkinson's disease.Neuropsychology. 2011 Nov;25(6):720-33. doi: 10.1037/a0024674. Neuropsychology. 2011. PMID: 21728428
-
Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.Exp Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):255-275. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000494. Exp Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33111659
-
Modeling the dynamics of recognition memory testing with an integrated model of retrieval and decision making.Cogn Psychol. 2018 Aug;104:106-142. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 17. Cogn Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29778777
-
Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 29492785 Review.
-
Free recall and recognition in a network model of the hippocampus: simulating effects of scopolamine on human memory function.Behav Brain Res. 1997 Dec;89(1-2):1-34. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00048-x. Behav Brain Res. 1997. PMID: 9475612 Review.
Cited by
-
Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Mar;3(1):37-60. doi: 10.3758/BF03210740. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996. PMID: 24214802
-
Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1062-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03196737. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004. PMID: 15875976
-
Learning how to exploit sources of information.Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):696-705. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0881-x. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30547364
-
Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):679-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03193306. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 17848026
-
Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1013-1032. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01249-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Mem Cognit. 2022. PMID: 34811640
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical