Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jan-Feb;123(1):67-75.
doi: 10.1177/003335490812300110.

A profile of state-level differences in the oral health of people with and without disabilities, in the U.S., in 2004

Brian S Armour  1 , Mark Swanson, H Barry Waldman, Steven P Perlman
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A profile of state-level differences in the oral health of people with and without disabilities, in the U.S., in 2004

Brian S Armour et al. Public Health Rep. 2008 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide state-level surveillance data assess the oral health of people with disabilities.

Methods: Data from the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)--a state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population 18 years of age and older--were used to estimate disability prevalence and state-level differences in oral health among people with and those without disabilities.

Results: Nationally, people with disabilities were less likely than people without disabilities to visit a dentist or dental clinic in the past year. The percentage of people with disabilities who reported they had visited a dentist in the past year was lowest in Mississippi (48.9%) and highest in Connecticut (74.5%). Among people without disabilities reporting they had visited a dentist or dental clinic in the past year, the percentage was lowest in Mississippi (60.7%) and highest in Minnesota (80.7%). Edentulism was higher among people with disabilities compared with those without disabilities. Among people with disabilities, edentulism was lowest in the District of Columbia (4.1%) and highest in Kentucky (18.7%). Among people without disabilities, edentulism was lowest in California (2.7%) and highest in Kentucky (11.3%).

Conclusions: Despite numerous studies and reports documenting the unmet oral health needs of people with disabilities, there has been no systematic national surveillance of oral health among people with disabilities in the United States. This article provides much-needed state-by-state and national epidemiologic data regarding the oral health of people with disabilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Age-adjusted prevalence of disability among adults 18+ years of age, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2004
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services (US) Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): DHHS, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.
    1. Steinmetz E. Current Population Reports, P70-107. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau; 2006. Americans with disabilities: 2002.
    1. Department of Health and Human Services (US) Healthy people 2010. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Washington: DHHS; 2000. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Workshop on disability in America: a new look. Washington: National Academy Press; 2006.
    1. Department of Health and Human Services (US) National call to action to promote oral health. Rockville (MD): DHHS, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; 2003. NIH Publication No. 03-5303. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms