Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar 28;14(12):1898-902.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1898.

Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Affiliations

Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Mohammad-K Tarzamni et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate portal hypertension parameters in liver cirrhosis patients with and without esophageal varices (EV).

Methods: A cohort of patients with biopsy confirmed liver cirrhosis was investigated endoscopically and with color Doppler ultrasonography as a possible non-invasive predictive tool. The relationship between portal hemodynamics and the presence and size of EV was evaluated using uni- and multivariate approaches.

Results: Eighty five consecutive cirrhotic patients (43 men and 42 women) were enrolled. Mean age (+/- SD) was 47.5 (+/- 15.9). Portal vein diameter (13.88 +/- 2.42 vs 12.00 +/- 1.69, P < 0.0005) and liver vascular index (8.31 +/- 2.72 vs 17.8 +/- 6.28, P < 0.0005) were found to be significantly higher in patients with EV irrespective of size and in patients with large varices (14.54 +/- 1.48 vs 13.24 +/- 2.55, P < 0.05 and 6.45 +/- 2.78 vs 10.96 +/- 5.05, P < 0.0005, respectively), while portal vein flow velocity (13.25 +/- 3.66 vs 20.25 +/- 5.05, P < 0.0005), congestion index (CI) (0.11 +/- 0.03 vs 0.06 +/- 0.03, P < 0.0005), portal hypertensive index (2.62 +/- 0.79 vs 1.33 +/- 0.53, P < 0.0005), and hepatic (0.73 +/- 0.07 vs 0.66 +/- 0.07, P < 0.001) and splenic artery resistance index (RI) (0.73 +/- 0.06 vs 0.62 +/- 0.08, P < 0.0005) were significantly lower. A logistic regression model confirmed spleen size (P = 0.002, AUC 0.72) and portal hypertensive index (P = 0.040, AUC 0.79) as independent predictors for the occurrence of large esophageal varices (LEV).

Conclusion: Our data suggest two independent situations for beginning endoscopic evaluation of compensated cirrhotic patients: Portal hypertensive index > 2.08 and spleen size > 15.05 cm. These factors may help identifying patients with a low probability of LEV who may not need upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hegab AM, Luketic VA. Bleeding esophageal varices. How to treat this dreaded complication of portal hypertension. Postgrad Med. 2001;109:75–76, 81-86, 89. - PubMed
    1. Tsokos M, Turk EE. Esophageal variceal hemorrhage presenting as sudden death in outpatients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:1197–1200. - PubMed
    1. Brandenburger LA, Regenstein FG. Variceal Hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2002;5:73–80. - PubMed
    1. Seewald S, Seitz U, Yang AM, Soehendra N. Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension: still a therapeutic challenge? Endoscopy. 2001;33:126–139. - PubMed
    1. Bratovic I, Lacevic N. Management of esophageal varices. Med Arh. 2002;56:11–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms