Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Mar;47(2):57-62.

Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in disposable and reusable ventilated mouse cages

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in disposable and reusable ventilated mouse cages

Jerald Silverman et al. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

This study compares resuable and disposable individually ventilated mouse cages in terms of the formation of intracage CO2 and NH3. Crl:CD-1(ICR) female mice were placed in either disposable or reusable ventilated cages in a positive pressure animal rack. Intracage CO2 and NH3 were measured once daily for 9 d; temperature and relative humidity were monitored for the first 7 d. Results indicated higher CO2 levels in the rear of the disposable cages and in the front of the reusable cages. This pattern corresponded to where the mice tended to congregate. However, CO2 concentrations did not differ significantly between the 2 cage types. Average CO2 levels in both cage types never exceeded approximately 3000 ppm. Intracage NH3 began to rise in the reusable cages on day 4, reached approximately 50 ppm by day 5 and by day 9 was greater than 150 ppm at the cages' rear sampling port while remaining at approximately 70 ppm at the front sampling port. Intracage NH3 levels in the disposable cages remained less than or equal to 3.2 ppm. Intracage temperature and relative humidity were approximately the same in both cage types. We concluded that the disposable ventilated cage performed satisfactorily under the conditions of the study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Average daily CO2 concentrations from front or rear sampling ports of 2 disposable (D-IVC) and 3 reusable (R-IVC) ventilated cages.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Average daily NH3 concentrations from front and rear sampling ports of 2 disposable (D-IVC) and 3 reusable (R-IVC) ventilated cages and associated average relative humidity (%RH) at the time of sampling.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baumans V, Schlingmann F, Vonck M, Van Fith H. 2002. Individually ventilated cages: beneficial for mice and men? Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 41:13–19 - PubMed
    1. Broderson JR, Lindsey J, Crawford J. 1976. The role of environmental ammonia in respiratory mycoplasmosis of rats. Am J Pathol 85:115–130 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burn CC, Mason GJ. 2005. Absorbencies of six different rodent beddings: commercially advertised absorbencies are potentially misleading. Lab Anim 39:68–74 - PubMed
    1. Burn CC, Peters A, Day MJ, Mason GJ. 2006. Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study. Lab Anim 40:353–370 - PubMed
    1. Coon RA, Jones RA, Jenkins LF, Siegel J. 1970. Animal inhalation studies on ammonia, ethylene glycol, formaldehyde, dimethylamine and ethanol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 16:646–655 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources