Observational evidence for determining drug safety
- PMID: 18356209
- PMCID: PMC2270986
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39491.493252.80
Observational evidence for determining drug safety
Abstract
Is no substitute for evidence from randomised controlled trials
Conflict of interest statement
NF has received funding from drug companies (but not the manufacturer of aprotinin) for research, consultation, and educational services in the area of drug efficacy and safety. AI is employed by the Estonian State Agency of Medicines (SAM) and is a member of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMEA) committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP) and paediatric committee (PDCO). The views expressed in the article are his own and not those of SAM or EMEA.
Comment in
-
Observational evidence for determining drug safety: Too high a pedestal.BMJ. 2008 Apr 5;336(7647):735. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39535.475648.1F. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18390501 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Fruberg CD, Levin AA, Gross PA, Shapiro RS, Strom BL. The FDA and drug safety: a proposal for sweeping change. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1938-42. - PubMed
-
- European Commission. Strategy to better protect public health by strengthening and rationalising EU pharmacovigilance: public consultation on legislative proposals. 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/pharmacovigilance_acs/doc...
-
- Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C. The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2006;354:353-65. - PubMed
-
- Mangano DT, Miao Y, Vuylsteke A, Tudor IC, Juneja R, Filipescu D, et al. Mortality associated with aprotinin during 5 years following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2007;297:471-9. - PubMed
-
- Food and Drug Administration. Early communication about an ongoing safety review aprotinin injection (marketed as trasylol). 2007. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/early_comm/aprotinin.htm
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical