Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;110(5):455-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 21.

Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus

Affiliations

Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus

Lisa D Ravdin et al. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objective: To identify components of gait associated with a positive tap test (TT) in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).

Patients and methods: Thirty-three patients with iNPH underwent clinical evaluation pre- and post-TT and were classified as responders (Rs) or non-responders (NRs). Elements of gait were assessed with a formal standardized Gait Scale and compared between groups.

Results: Analysis of pre/post-TT group differences revealed an interaction for Total Gait Score and Walking Score, with improvements in responders only. Total Gait Scores improved by 29% in the Rs and 4.85% in the NRs. Rs showed significant post-TT improvements on a timed 10m walk, turning, and balance. Tandem walking, turning, truck balance and start stop hesitation showed trends toward improvement.

Conclusions: The classic features of gait often used in determining diagnosis of NPH (wide based stride, reduced foot-floor clearance, and small steps) were not helpful in identifying responders to the TT. Walking speed, steps for turning, and tendency towards falling were most likely to improve post-TT. These straightforward measures can readily be adapted into clinical practice to assist in determination of shunt candidacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hakim S, Adams RD. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 1965;2(4):307–327. - PubMed
    1. Krauss JK, Halve B. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: survey on contemporary diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146(4):379–388. discussion 388. - PubMed
    1. Fisher CM. Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology. 1982;32(12):1358–1363. - PubMed
    1. Hughes CP, Siegel BA, Coxe WS, Gado MH, Grubb RL, Coleman RE, et al. Adult idiopathic communicating hydrocephalus with and without shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;41(11):961–971. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersen RC, Mokri B, Laws ER., Jr Surgical treatment of idiopathic hydrocephalus in elderly patients. Neurology. 1985;35(3):307–311. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms