Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Mar;23(1):27-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit: comparison of risk factors

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit: comparison of risk factors

Marine Giard et al. J Crit Care. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare risk factors of early- (E) and late-onset (L) ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Materials and methods: An epidemiological survey based on a nosocomial infection surveillance program of 11 intensive care units (ICUs) of university teaching hospitals in Lyon, France, was conducted. A total of 7236 consecutive ventilated patients, older than 18 years and hospitalized in ICUs for at least 48 hours, were studied between 1996 and 2002. Data during ICU stay, patient-dependent risk factors, device exposure, nosocomial infections occurrence, and outcome were collected. The cutoff point definition between E-VAP (<or=6 days) and L-VAP (>six days) was based on the daily hazard rate of VAP.

Results: The VAP incidence rate was 13.1%, 356 (37.6%) E-VAP (within 6 days of admission) and 590 (62.4%) L-VAP were reported. Independent risk factor for E-VAP vs L-VAP was surgical diagnostic category (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.07]), whereas independent risk factors for L-VAP vs E-VAP were older age (OR, 1.01 [1.01-1.02]), high Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (OR, 1.01 [1.00-1.02]), infection on admission (OR=2.22 [1.61-3.03]), another nosocomial infection before VAP (OR, 5.88 [3.33-11.11]), and exposure to central venous catheter before VAP (OR, 4.76 [1.04-20.00]).

Conclusions: E-VAP and L-VAP have different risk factors, highlighting the need for developing specific preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances