Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;11(3):444-50.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0120.

Ethical and logistical considerations of multicenter parental bereavement research

Affiliations

Ethical and logistical considerations of multicenter parental bereavement research

Kathleen Lynn Meert et al. J Palliat Med. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Multicenter research has the potential to recruit participants with diverse racial, ethnic, and geographic backgrounds and is essential for understanding heterogeneity in bereavement. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN) is a multicenter network charged with conducting research on the pathophysiology and management of critical illness in childhood. Among its research activities, the CPCCRN has undertaken research in parental bereavement because most childhood deaths in the United States occur in hospitals, primarily in critical care units.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to discuss ethical and logistical issues found by the CPCCRN to be problematic to multicenter research with bereaved parents and to explore research strategies that may be practicably implemented.

Results: Ethical and logistical challenges encountered by the CPCCRN included issues of privacy; confidentiality; voluntariness; minimizing risks; working with multiple institutional review boards; researcher qualifications, training and support; and methods of data collection. Strategies to address these challenges included local recruitment of participants; flexibility in consent methods across sites; participant options for methods of data collection; involvement of local bereavement support services; central training of researchers with systematic monitoring and opportunities for support; and use of a secure Web-based collaborative workspace.

Conclusions: Multicenter parental bereavement research has distinct ethical issues that must be addressed by the logistics of the research plan. Greater attention to the issues identified may facilitate research to reduce adverse mental and physical health outcomes in a diverse population of bereaved individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Genevro JL, Marshall T, Miller T Center for the Advancement of Health: Report on bereavement and grief research. Death Stud. 2004;28:491–575. - PubMed
    1. Stroebe M, Stroebe W, Schut H. Bereavement research: Methodological issues and ethical concerns. Palliat Med. 2003;17:235–240. - PubMed
    1. Koenig BA, Back AL, Crawley LM. Qualitative methods in end-of-life research: Recommendations to enhance the protection of human subjects. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;25:S43–52. - PubMed
    1. George LK. Research design in end-of-life research: State of science. Gerontologist. 2002;42:86–98. - PubMed
    1. Addington-Hall J. Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2002;11:220–224. - PubMed