[Prediction of functional decline in elderly patients discharged from the accident and emergency department]
- PMID: 18365512
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03078119
[Prediction of functional decline in elderly patients discharged from the accident and emergency department]
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive validity of 5 screening tools with respect to functional decline in older persons discharged from the Accident & Emergency Department.
Methods: The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR), Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST), questionnaire of Runciman, questionnaire of Rowland and the Voorlopige Indicator voor Plaatsing (VIP) were collected in 83 older persons discharged from the Emergency Department of the University Hospitals of Leuven. Functional decline was derived from the Katz-scale, reflecting the condition 14 days before admission, at admission, 14, 30 and 90 days after discharge.
Results: The screening tools with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value at 14 days after discharge were the questionnaire of Rowland and the ISAR. Thirty and ninety days after discharge, the ISAR was most sensitive and predictive.
Conclusion: Sensitivity and negative predictive value are the most important parameters for screening tools. Hence, our study suggests that the ISAR instrument is the most appropriate instrument to predict functional decline in ambulatory older persons admitted to the emergency department. The ISAR can easily be integrated in nursing records and can be systematically employed in older persons at the emergency department.
Similar articles
-
Screening for risk of readmission of patients aged 65 years and above after discharge from the emergency department: predictive value of four instruments.Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;14(6):315-23. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3282aa3e45. Eur J Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17968196
-
Risk stratification of older patients in the emergency department: comparison between the Identification of Seniors at Risk and Triage Risk Screening Tool.Rejuvenation Res. 2012 Jun;15(3):288-94. doi: 10.1089/rej.2011.1239. Epub 2012 Jun 25. Rejuvenation Res. 2012. PMID: 22730956
-
Does the get up and go test improve predictive accuracy of the Triage Risk Screening Tool or Rowland questionnaire in older patients admitted to the emergency department?Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000413. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 27362331
-
Risk scores identifying elderly inpatients at risk of 30-day unplanned readmission and accident and emergency department visit: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e028302. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028302. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31362964 Free PMC article.
-
[Preoperative risk identification using the Identification of Seniors at Risk? : Suitability as sole screening tool for inpatient aged risk patients].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jun;51(4):388-393. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1401-0. Epub 2018 May 23. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018. PMID: 29796867 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Predicting functional adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a systematic review of screening tools.J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 May;14(5):394-9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0086-x. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010. PMID: 20424808
-
Validity, Reliability and Feasibility of Tools to Identify Frail Older Patients in Inpatient Hospital Care: A Systematic Review.J Nutr Health Aging. 2016 Feb;20(2):218-30. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0567-z. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016. PMID: 26812520