Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;31(4):275-82.
doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831040-00001.

A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 2: in excessive or heavy menstrual bleeding

Affiliations
Review

A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 2: in excessive or heavy menstrual bleeding

Ian S Fraser et al. Drug Saf. 2008.

Abstract

The first part of this benefit-risk review examined the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of systemic haemostatic agents commonly used in major surgery. The second part of this review examines the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of systemic haemostatic agents commonly used in the treatment of excessive or heavy menstrual bleeding, and provides individual benefit-risk profiles that may assist clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological therapy in this setting. Historically, surgery has played a dominant role in treatment; however, pharmacological therapy is increasingly popular, especially in women who wish to retain their fertility. When selecting the appropriate treatment, patient preference should be considered, as well as the benefits and risks associated with each agent. Recommended pharmacological therapies that are effective and generally well tolerated include the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and the oral agents tranexamic acid, NSAIDs (e.g. mefenamic acid) and combined estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptives. In patients with an underlying bleeding disorder (e.g. von Willebrand disease), an additional option is intranasal desmopressin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Jan;90(1):78-83 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;102(5):401-6 - PubMed
    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Mar;73(3):274-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Oct 11;164(18):1965-76 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1997 Dec;85(6):1258-67 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources