Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan;9(1):15-21.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0005-4.

Functional preservation in patients with renal cortical tumors: the rationale for partial nephrectomy

Affiliations
Review

Functional preservation in patients with renal cortical tumors: the rationale for partial nephrectomy

Paul Russo. Curr Urol Rep. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Renal cortical tumors (RCT) are a family of neoplasms with diverse histology and metastatic potentials. Conventional clear cell tumors account for 54% of all RCT and 90% of those that metastasize. Liberal use of abdominal imaging detects 70% of RCT incidentally and at a small size (< 4 cm in diameter). Emerging evidence strongly favors partial nephrectomy (PN) as the primary treatment when technically possible for tumors 7 cm or smaller. This approach provides local tumor control equivalent to radical nephrectomy (RN) and prevents or delays chronic kidney disease (CKD) onset. CKD is present in 26% of apparently well patients with such small renal tumors and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hospitalization, and death. The likelihood of freedom from an estimated glomerular filtration rate lower than 45 mL/min/1.73m2, a level of significant CKD, is 95% after PN, but only 64% after RN. RN should be reserved for patients with massive renal tumors in whom PN is not an option. Increased training in PN and its wider application is essential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Transplantation. 2001 Aug 15;72(3):444-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2005 Apr 13;293(14):1737-45 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):71-4 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):615-20 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):41-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources