Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes
- PMID: 18371473
- PMCID: PMC2636970
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.12.032
Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes
Abstract
Surgical and percutaneous coronary artery intervention revascularization are traditionally considered isolated options. A simultaneous hybrid approach may allow an opportunity to match the best strategy for a particular anatomic lesion. Concerns regarding safety and feasibility of such an approach exist. We examined the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of a simultaneous hybrid revascularization strategy (minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting of the left anterior descending [LAD] artery and drug-eluting stent [DES] to non-LAD lesions) in 13 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease that underwent left internal mammary artery to LAD minimally invasive direct coronary bypass performed through a lateral thoracotomy, followed by stenting of non-LAD lesions, in a fluoroscopy-equipped operating room. Assessment of coagulation parameters was also undertaken. Inhospital and postdischarge outcomes of these patients were compared to a group of 26 propensity score matched parallel controls that underwent standard off-pump coronary artery bypass. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. All hybrid patients were successfully treated with DES and no inhospital mortality occurred in either group. Hybrid patients had a shorter length of stay (3.6 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.3 days, P < .0001) and intubation times (0.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.7 +/- 9.6 hours, P < .02). Despite aggressive anticoagulation and confirmed platelet inhibition, hybrid patients had less blood loss (581 +/- 402 vs 1242 +/- 941 mL, P < .05) and decreased transfusions (0.33 +/- 0.49 vs 1.47 +/- 1.53 U, P < .01). Six-month angiographic vessel patency and major adverse cardiac events were similar in the hybrid and off-pump coronary artery bypass groups. A simultaneous hybrid approach consisting of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery to LAD combined with revascularization of the remaining coronary targets using percutaneous coronary artery intervention with DES is a feasible option accomplished with acceptable clinical outcomes without increased bleeding risk.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Midterm outcomes of simultaneous hybrid coronary artery revascularization for left main coronary artery disease.Heart Surg Forum. 2012 Feb;15(1):E18-22. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20111004. Heart Surg Forum. 2012. PMID: 22360899
-
Single-stage hybrid coronary revascularization with long-term follow-up.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):438-42; discussion 442-3. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt390. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 23956269
-
Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):563-70. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118466. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11579343
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.024. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15511503 Review.
-
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276503 Review.
Cited by
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May 1;10:63. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0262-5. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25928276 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of layer-specific strain for evaluating and predicting recovery of left ventricular myocardial function in patients undergoing hybrid coronary revascularization.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Mar;39(3):491-499. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02746-1. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36327011
-
Hybrid myocardial revascularization.Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0646-y. Epub 2018 Mar 5. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 33060954 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:142616. doi: 10.1155/2013/142616. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013. PMID: 23691303 Free PMC article.
-
Clopidogrel Loading Dose 300 vs. 600 mg in Patients Undergoing One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Pilot Study.Front Surg. 2021 Oct 15;8:768860. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.768860. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34722627 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Salam AM, Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR., Jr Drug-eluting coronary stents. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006;31:8–119. - PubMed
-
- Guyton RA. Coronary artery bypass is superior to drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1949–57. - PubMed
-
- Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1–6. - PubMed
-
- Amodeo VJ, Donias HW, Dancona G, et al. The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology. 2002;53:665–9. - PubMed
-
- Kiaii B, McClure RS, Kostuk WJ, et al. Concurrent robotic hybrid revascularization using an enhanced operative suite. Chest. 2005;128:4046–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical