Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming
- PMID: 1837297
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.1057
Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming
Abstract
Reaction time (RT) differences to visual stimuli as a function of expectancy have been attributed to changes in perceptual processing or entirely to shifts in decision and response criteria. To help distinguish between these competing interpretations, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded to lateralized flashes delivered to visual field locations precued by a central arrow (valid stimuli) or not precued (invalid stimuli). Validly cued stimuli in both simple and choice RT tasks elicited consistent amplitude enhancements of the early, sensory-evoked PI component of the ERP recorded at scalp sites overlying lateral prestriate visual cortex (90-130 ms poststimulus). In contrast, the subsequent N1 component (150-200 ms) was enhanced by validly cued stimuli in the choice RT task condition only. These electrophysiological findings support models proposing that the behavioral effects of precuing expected target locations are due, at least in part, to changes in sensory-perceptual processing. Furthermore, these data provide specific information regarding the neural mechanisms underlying such effects.
Similar articles
-
"Sensory gating" as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jun;55(6):667-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03211681. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8058454
-
ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Dec 13. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16356572
-
An electrophysiological investigation of the spatial distribution of attention to colored stimuli in focused and divided attention conditions.Biol Psychol. 1989 Dec;29(3):213-45. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(89)90021-5. Biol Psychol. 1989. PMID: 2640159
-
Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.Psychophysiology. 1995 Jan;32(1):4-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x. Psychophysiology. 1995. PMID: 7878167 Review.
-
Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?Biol Psychol. 2003 Oct;64(1-2):27-45. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00101-7. Biol Psychol. 2003. PMID: 14602354 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in early and late stages of information processing between slow versus fast participants.Int Arch Med. 2014 Nov 24;7:49. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-7-49. eCollection 2014. Int Arch Med. 2014. PMID: 25838842 Free PMC article.
-
Haloperidol 2 mg impairs inhibition but not visuospatial attention.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jan;234(2):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4454-z. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017. PMID: 27747369
-
From Sensory Perception to Lexical-Semantic Processing: An ERP Study in Non-Verbal Children with Autism.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0161637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161637. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27560378 Free PMC article.
-
New horizons in brain-computer interface research.Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 16. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 22902247 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
I know what is missing here: electrophysiological prediction error signals elicited by omissions of predicted "what" but not "when".Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 29;7:407. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00407. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23908618 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous