Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration
- PMID: 1837302
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.891
Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration
Abstract
Four experiments used the visual search paradigm to examine feature integration mechanisms. Reaction time to determine the presence or absence of a conjunctive target is relatively fast and exhaustive for low-density displays. Search rate is slow and self-terminating for high-density displays. Density effects do not arise when the target is defined by a unique feature. Two mechanisms are proposed for feature integration. A fast mechanism integrates features on the basis of coarse location information coded with the initial registration of the features. This coarse location mechanism requires that display items be spaced apart. A second, slower mechanism is used when objects are clumped together. The 2-mechanism hypothesis provides a resolution to conflicting findings in the visual search and illusory-conjunction literature. A possible interpretation of the findings with a single guided search mechanism for feature integration is also discussed.
Similar articles
-
Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Nov;15(4):650-63. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.650. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989. PMID: 2531202
-
Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):652-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.652. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991. PMID: 1834783
-
Visual feature integration with an attention deficit.Brain Cogn. 1994 Jan;24(1):44-56. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1003. Brain Cogn. 1994. PMID: 8123263
-
Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989. PMID: 2527952
-
Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):80-102. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.80. Psychol Rev. 1994. PMID: 8121961 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of Attention in the Binding of Surface Features to Locations.Vis cogn. 2009;17(1-2):10.1080/13506280802113894. doi: 10.1080/13506280802113894. Vis cogn. 2009. PMID: 24235876 Free PMC article.
-
Viewing the dynamics and control of visual attention through the lens of electrophysiology.Vision Res. 2013 Mar 22;80:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jan 25. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23357579 Free PMC article.
-
Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task.Percept Psychophys. 1993 Jun;53(6):693-703. doi: 10.3758/bf03211745. Percept Psychophys. 1993. PMID: 8332435
-
Why is Information Displaced from Visual Working Memory during Visual Search?Vis cogn. 2010;18(2):10.1080/13506280902734326. doi: 10.1080/13506280902734326. Vis cogn. 2010. PMID: 24204180 Free PMC article.
-
The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization search task.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1134-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03208370. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 8539089
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources