Cancer genetics evaluation: barriers to and improvements for referral
- PMID: 18373400
- DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0036
Cancer genetics evaluation: barriers to and improvements for referral
Abstract
Despite the availability of cancer susceptibility testing, little information exists regarding physicians' selection and referral of eligible patients. This study provides insight into whom, why, and when physicians refer for cancer genetics evaluation, as well as their comfort level within this role. Eighty-two physicians (51 primary care, 15 gynecology, 11 surgery and 5 oncology) completed a survey (response rate: 34%) regarding cancer genetics referral practices. Of these, 59% reported an awareness of the hospital's cancer genetics program. Program awareness was greater among oncologists, surgeons, and gynecologists than among primary care physicians (p < 0.0001). Patients were referred for enhanced risk assessment (88%), improved medical management (85%), and concern for family members (83%). Patient eligibility was based on family cancer history (96%), patient cancer history (83%), and patient request (73%). Patients were not referred mainly due to patient disinterest (54%) or physician concern about either insurance coverage (44%) or insurance discrimination (31%). Primary care physicians were less comfortable with identifying patients for referral (p < 0.001) and with discussing genetics (p < 0.002) than specialists. The largest barriers to referral were lack of program awareness and limited knowledge regarding patient eligibility, improved insurance coverage, and antidiscrimination legislation. Physician-targeted marketing and education may improve the referral process.
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12692171
-
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520094
-
Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.J Fam Pract. 2002 Mar;51(3):215-22. J Fam Pract. 2002. PMID: 11978231
-
Exploring cancer genetics and care of the family: an evolving challenge for palliative care.Int J Palliat Nurs. 2006 Feb;12(2):70-4. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2006.12.2.20533. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16603995 Review.
-
Analysing spatial trends in referral patterns to cancer genetics services: a preliminary investigation of regional variations in Wales.Health Serv Manage Res. 2004 Nov;17(4):263-71. doi: 10.1258/0951484042317732. Health Serv Manage Res. 2004. PMID: 15527541 Review.
Cited by
-
Barriers and motivators for referral of patients with suspected lynch syndrome to cancer genetic services: a qualitative study.J Pers Med. 2014 Feb 18;4(1):20-34. doi: 10.3390/jpm4010020. J Pers Med. 2014. PMID: 25562140 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009 Dec;13(6):735-41. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0037. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009. PMID: 20001580 Free PMC article.
-
Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Sep-Oct;61(5):327-59. doi: 10.3322/caac.20128. Epub 2011 Aug 19. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011. PMID: 21858794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Referral to cancer genetic counseling: do migrant status and patients' educational background matter?J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0326-4. Epub 2017 Sep 4. J Community Genet. 2017. PMID: 28868568 Free PMC article.
-
Why is genetic screening for autosomal dominant disorders underused in families? The case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.Genet Med. 2011 Sep;13(9):812-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d2e6d. Genet Med. 2011. PMID: 21637104 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources