Porous bioactive nanostructured scaffolds for bone regeneration: a sol-gel solution
- PMID: 18373428
- DOI: 10.2217/17435889.3.2.233
Porous bioactive nanostructured scaffolds for bone regeneration: a sol-gel solution
Abstract
Considerable advances have been seen in materials with tailored nanostructures in recent years, owing, in part, to increased demands placed on material properties in fields, such as tissue regeneration and wound healing. This review focuses on the developments made in nanoporous bioactive glasses, their novel nanocomposites and their application to bone regeneration. Bioactive glasses have the ability to stimulate new bone growth as they dissolve in the body. Sol-gel bioactive glasses have a nanoporosity that provides sites for cell attachment and tailorable degradation rates. Importantly, the glasses can be made into interconnected porous structures that can be used as 3D templates for bone growth, although, because they are glasses, they cannot be implanted directly into sites that are under cyclic loading. Composites provide a partial solution to this problem, although their bioactive and degradation properties are not ideal, therefore novel nanocomposites are needed. The route to these potentially ideal materials is described.
Similar articles
-
Bioactive composite materials for tissue engineering scaffolds.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 May;2(3):303-17. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.3.303. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005. PMID: 16288594 Review.
-
Characterizing the hierarchical structures of bioactive sol-gel silicate glass and hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012 Mar 28;370(1963):1422-43. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0308. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012. PMID: 22349249 Review.
-
Nanostructured scaffolds for neural applications.Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008 Apr;3(2):183-99. doi: 10.2217/17435889.3.2.183. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008. PMID: 18373425 Review.
-
Sol-gel silica-based biomaterials and bone tissue regeneration.Acta Biomater. 2010 Aug;6(8):2874-88. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Feb 10. Acta Biomater. 2010. PMID: 20152946 Review.
-
Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(7):964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017. Epub 2005 Aug 18. Biomaterials. 2006. PMID: 16102812
Cited by
-
Role and implications of nanodiagnostics in the changing trends of clinical diagnosis.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014 Apr;21(2):109-17. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24600302 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cerium Containing Bioactive Glasses: A Review.ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021 Sep 13;7(9):4388-4401. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00414. Epub 2021 Sep 1. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021. PMID: 34468119 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D Printed Porous Methacrylate/Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Bone Substitution.Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Jun;10(12):e2100117. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100117. Epub 2021 May 5. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021. PMID: 33951318 Free PMC article.
-
Degradation, bioactivity, and osteogenic potential of composites made of PLGA and two different sol-gel bioactive glasses.Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Aug;39(8):2114-29. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011. PMID: 21487840 Free PMC article.
-
Nanotechnology-based theranostic and prophylactic approaches against SARS-CoV-2.Immunol Res. 2024 Feb;72(1):14-33. doi: 10.1007/s12026-023-09416-x. Epub 2023 Sep 8. Immunol Res. 2024. PMID: 37682455 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources