Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;62(7):1571-1586.
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00385.x.

Determinants of the strength of disruptive and/or divergent selection arising from resource competition

Affiliations

Determinants of the strength of disruptive and/or divergent selection arising from resource competition

Peter A Abrams et al. Evolution. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

We investigate how the intensity of competition for resources affects the strength of disruptive selection on a resource acquisition trait. This is done by analyzing several consumer-resource models in which consumers use a linear array of resources. We show that disruptive selection can be diminished under both strong and weak competition, making disruptive selection a unimodal function of the strength of competition. Weak selection under strong competition arises when competition causes the extinction (for self-reproducing resources) or depletion (for abiotic resources) of the most rapidly caught resources. Weak selection under weak competition is a consequence of minimal effects of consumers on resources. The precise relationship between intensity of competition and strength of disruptive selection is sensitive to the shape of the consumer's resource utilization curve and the nature of resource growth. The most strongly unimodal competition-selection relationships result from utilization curves with long tails. Our results show that a simple comparison of the width of the resource abundance distribution and the consumer's utilization function is not sufficient to determine whether selection is disruptive. The results may explain some contradictory experimental findings regarding the effect of consumer mortality on the strength of disruptive selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

LITERATURE CITED

    1. Abrams, P. A. 1975. Limiting similarity and the form of the competition coefficient. Theor. Popul. Biol. 8:356-375.
    1. Abrams, P. A. 1977. Density independent mortality and interspecific competition: a test of Pianka's niche overlap hypothesis. Am. Nat. 111:539-552.
    1. Abrams, P. A. 1980a. Are competition coefficients constant? Inductive vs. deductive approaches. Am. Nat. 116:730-735.
    1. Abrams, P. A. 1980b. Consumer functional response and competition in consumer-resource systems. Theor. Popul. Biol. 17:80-102.
    1. Abrams, P. A. 1983. The theory of limiting similarity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14:359-376.

Publication types