Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Mar 28:8:84.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-84.

Systematic review of the clinical effect of glucocorticoids on nonhematologic malignancy

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review of the clinical effect of glucocorticoids on nonhematologic malignancy

Bruce D Keith. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Glucocorticoids are often used in the treatment of nonhematologic malignancy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of the effect of glucocorticoid therapy on nonhematologic malignancy.

Methods: A systematic review of clinical studies of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with nonhematologic malignancy was undertaken. Only studies having endpoints of tumor response or tumor control or survival were included. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register/Databases, conference proceedings (ASCO, AACR, ASTRO/ASTR, ESMO, ECCO) and other resources were used. Data was extracted using a standard form. There was quality assessment of each study. There was a narrative synthesis of information, with presentation of results in tables. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were performed using data from published reports and a fixed effect model.

Results: Fifty four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one meta-analysis, four phase l/ll trials and four case series met the eligibility criteria. Clinical trials of glucocorticoid monotherapy in breast and prostate cancer showed modest response rates. In advanced breast cancer meta-analyses, the addition of glucocorticoids to either chemotherapy or other endocrine therapy resulted in increased response rate, but not increased survival. In GI cancer, there was one RCT each of glucocorticoids vs. supportive care and chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids; glucocorticoid effect was neutral. The only RCT found of chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids, in which the glucocorticoid arm did worse, was in lung cancer. In glucocorticoid monotherapy, meta-analysis found that continuous high dose glucocorticoids had a detrimental effect on survival. The only other evidence, for a detrimental effect of glucocorticoid monotherapy, was in one of the two trials in lung cancer.

Conclusion: Glucocorticoid monotherapy has some benefit in breast and prostate cancer. In advanced breast cancer, the addition of glucocorticoids to other therapy does not change the long term outcome. In GI cancer, glucocorticoids most likely have a neutral effect. High dose continuous glucocorticoids have a detrimental effect in nonhematologic malignancy. Glucocorticoid therapy might have a deleterious impact in lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest Plot of Response Rates of Endocrine Therapy +/- Glucocorticoids in Advanced Breast Cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest Plot of One Year Survival Rates of Endocrine Therapy +/- Glucocorticoids in Advanced Breast Cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest Plot of Response Rates of Chemotherapy +/- Glucocorticoids in Advanced Breast Cancer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest Plot of One Year Survival Rates of Chemotherapy +/- Glucocorticoids in Advanced Breast Cancer.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest Plot of Eight Week Mortality Rates in Two Trials of Glucocorticoid Monotherapy in Nonhematologic Malignancy.

References

    1. Rutz HP. Effects of corticosteroid use on treatment of solid tumours. Lancet. 2002;360:1969–1970. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11922-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herr I, Pfitzenmaier J. Glucocorticoid use in prostate cancer and other solid tumours: implications for effectiveness of cytotoxic treatment and metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:425–430. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70694-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CRD Report Number 4. 2. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK; Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness, CRD's Guidance for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews.
    1. Colsky J. A comparative study of 9alpha-bromo-11beta-keto-progesterone and prednisolone in the treatment of advanced carcinoma of the female breast. Cancer. 1963;16:502–505. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196304)16:4<502::AID-CNCR2820160410>3.0.CO;2-M. - DOI - PubMed

Substances