Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;12(2):207.
doi: 10.1186/cc6782. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

Clinical review: critical care transport and austere critical care

Affiliations
Review

Clinical review: critical care transport and austere critical care

David H Rice et al. Crit Care. 2008.

Abstract

The development of modern intensive care units (ICUs) has allowed the survival of patients with advanced illness and injury, although at a cost of substantial infrastructure. Natural disasters and military operations are two common situations that can create critically ill patients in an environment that is austere or has been rendered austere. This has driven the development of two related strategies to care for these casualties. Portable ICU capability can be rapidly established in the area of need, providing relatively advanced capability but limited capacity and sustainability. The other strategy is to rapidly evacuate critically ill and injured patients following their initial stabilization. This permits medical personnel in the austere location to focus resources on a larger number of less critical patients. It also permits the most vulnerable patients to receive care in an advanced center. This strategy requires careful planning to overcome the constraints of the transport environment. The optimal strategy has not been determined, but a combination of these two approaches has been used in recent disasters and military operations and is promising. The critical care delivered in an austere setting must be integrated with a long-term plan to provide follow-on care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pronovost P, Angus D, Dorman T, Robinson K, Dremsizov T, Young T. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288:2151–2162. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wedel S, Warren J, Harvey M, Biel MH, Dennis R. Guidelines for intensive care unit design. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:582–588. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199503000-00026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cocanour C, Allen S, Mazabob J, Sparks J, Fischer C, Romans J, Lally K. Lessons learned from the evacuation of an urban teaching hospital. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1141–1145. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1141. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nates J. Combined external and internal hospital disaster: impact and response in a Houston trauma center intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:686–690. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000114995.14120.6D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farmer JC, Carlton PK. Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2006;(Suppl 34):S56–59. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000199989.44467.2E. - DOI - PubMed