Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme
- PMID: 18374533
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.046
Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme
Abstract
To investigate compliance with the acceptance criteria of the European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening, a typetesting programme of the physical characteristics of digital mammography systems based on direct readout (DR) technology or computed radiography (CR) was organised and executed within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme. While in general image quality/dose characteristics of flat panel DR systems passed the acceptance criteria more easily than CR systems, the slit-scanning direct photon counting system included in present study was outstanding in combining a very low dose with a good image quality. The data obtained up to now indicate the necessity of retuning the AEC for DR systems according to constant contrast to noise ratio (CNR) over the whole range of PMMA thicknesses (20-70 mm) to improve image quality in imaging breasts of large thickness at the cost of higher doses. For the two CR systems which passed the typetesting procedure dose levels do not allow a similar improvement of CNR for thick objects for these systems. The obtained results highlight the importance of the use of high Z target/filter combinations in X-ray generating systems for imaging thick objects to meet the image quality/dose criteria. With respect to image display aspects high-quality 3-megapixel LCD monitors succeeded also in the typetesting procedure in addition to 5-megapixel monitors. However, as zooming and scrolling are necessary for 3-megapixel monitors to get the full resolution capabilities of the image capture system, 5-megapixel monitors are preferred in a busy screening environment.
Similar articles
-
Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.JBR-BTR. 2007 May-Jun;90(3):159-62. JBR-BTR. 2007. PMID: 17696080
-
Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):459-62. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq010. Epub 2010 Apr 15. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010. PMID: 20395413
-
[The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].Radiologe. 2005 Mar;45(3):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1180-7. Radiologe. 2005. PMID: 15747150 German.
-
Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Nov;1(11):854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.05.006. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004. PMID: 17411717 Review.
-
Artifacts in digital mammography.JBR-BTR. 2008 Nov-Dec;91(6):262-3. JBR-BTR. 2008. PMID: 19203002 Review.
Cited by
-
Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2891-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0. Epub 2013 May 21. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23689308
-
Impact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1808-19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3169-y. Epub 2014 May 10. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24816932
-
Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide.Insights Imaging. 2013 Oct;4(5):539-53. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1. Epub 2013 Aug 4. Insights Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23912879 Free PMC article.
-
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6. Epub 2010 May 9. Eur Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20455065
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical