Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5195-200.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712350105. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

CD11b expression distinguishes sequential stages of peritoneal B-1 development

Affiliations

CD11b expression distinguishes sequential stages of peritoneal B-1 development

Eliver Eid Bou Ghosn et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Peritoneal cavity (PerC) B-1 cells have long been known to express CD11b, which is coexpressed with CD18 to form the Mac-1/CR3 complement receptor and adhesion molecule. However, although all PerC B-1 cells are commonly believed to express CD11b, we show here that nearly half of the cells in each of the PerC B-1 subsets (B-1a and B-1b) do not express this surface receptor. The CD11b(+) cells in each B-1 subset are larger and more granular and express higher levels of surface IgM than the CD11b(-) B-1 cells. In addition, the CD11b(+) B-1 cells initiate the formation of tightly associated doublets that are present at high frequency in adult PerC. Finally, and most importantly from a developmental standpoint, the CD11b(+) B-1 cells have a limited reconstitution capability: when sorted and transferred into congenic recipients, they reconstitute their own (CD11b(+)) B-1 subset but do not reconstitute the CD11b(-) B-1 subset. In contrast, CD11b(-) B-1 cells transferred under the same conditions efficiently replenish all components of the PerC B-1 population in appropriate proportions. During ontogeny, CD11b(-) B-1 cells appear before CD11b(+) B-1 cells. However, the clear phenotypic differences between the neonatal and adult CD11b B-1 subsets argue that although CD11b(-) B-1 give rise to CD11b(+) B-1 in both cases different forces may regulate this transition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Successive gating scheme for identifying the CD11b+ and the CD11b subset on mouse B-1 cells. Total BALB/c adult PerC cells were stained according to the 11-color stain combinations described in Materials and Methods. Live cells were gated to include only lymphocytes (FSclow, SSclow), for which data are shown. The full gating sequence is included for on-line viewing.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
CD11b cells give rise to CD11b+ B-1 cells in adoptive recipients. CD11b and CD11b+ PerC cells were sorted from BALB/c (IgMa allotype) as described in Materials and Methods. Each sorted population was transferred into the PerC cells of BAB/25 recipients (nonirradiated). At 10–12 days after transfer, total recipient PerC cells were harvested and stained. For analysis, live cells were initially gated to include only IgM+ cells and donor (IgMa) B cells were distinguished and gated by staining with a mAb that detects IgMa (IgH-6a), whereas recipient B were identified and gated with a mAb that detects IgMb (IgH-6b). Each B cell population was then further gated by size to include only cells within the lymphocytes scatter gates (FSclow/SSclow) and analyzed for the expression level of CD11b. Only B-1 cells were detected in the donor B cell population.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
CD11b is expressed at higher levels on the CD11b+ B-1 cells than in RAG-deficient PerC recipients. CD11b or CD11b+ donor cells were sorted and transferred into RAG−/− (nonirradiated) recipients. After 10–12 days, total recipient PerC cells were harvested, stained, and analyzed according to the procedures described for Fig. 2.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
CD11b+ B-1 cells form firmly attached doublets. Total PerC cells from adult (BALB/c × CB.17)F1 mice (IgMa x IgMb) were harvested and stained according to the procedures described in Materials and Methods. Because the IgM on the B-1 cells in F1 animals is encoded either by the parental IgMa chromosome or the parental IgMb chromosome, cells were stained with both anti-IgMa (FITC) and anti-IgMb (Texas red) reagents in addition to an anti-IgM reagent (used for sorting) that detects both IgMa and IgMb. For confocal microscopy, CD11b+ B-1 cells (CD19high, IgMhigh) that fell within the FSchigh gate were sorted onto coverslips in a 24-well plate. The sorted cells were prepared and analyzed by confocal microscopy as described in Materials and Methods.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
CD11b+ B-1 cells arise late in ontogeny but still express the typical neonatal surface phenotype, which only gradually shifts to the adult B-1 phenotype. Total PerC cells were harvested from BALB/c mice at different ages (neonates, 10 days, 30 days, and 100 days) and stained with an 11-color combination that simultaneously detects surface expression of CD11b, IgVH11, IgM, and CD5 (see Materials and Methods). B-1 cells were identified according to the sequential gating scheme shown in Fig. 1. (Lower) IgM and CD5 expression on the B-1 subset is shown. (Upper) CD11b and VH11 expression on the same cells is shown.

References

    1. Stall AM, Adams S, Herzenberg LA, Kantor AB. Characteristics and development of the murine B-1b (Ly-1 B sister) cell population. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992;651:33–43. - PubMed
    1. Herzenberg LA, Kantor AB, Herzenberg LA. Layered evolution in the immune system: A model for the ontogeny and development of multiple lymphocyte lineages. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992;651:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Hayakawa K, Hardy RR, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. Progenitors for Ly-1 B cells are distinct from progenitors for other B cells. J Exp Med. 1985;161:1554–1568. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayakawa K, et al. Ly-1 B cells: Functionally distinct lymphocytes that secrete IgM autoantibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:2494–2498. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kantor AB, Herzenberg LA. Origin of murine B cell lineages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:501–538. - PubMed

Publication types