Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;101(9):1311-8.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn040. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

A canopy architectural model to study the competitive ability of chickpea with sowthistle

Affiliations

A canopy architectural model to study the competitive ability of chickpea with sowthistle

S-Zahra-Hosseini Cici et al. Ann Bot. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Improving the competitive ability of crops is a sustainable method of weed management. This paper shows how a virtual plant model of competition between chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) can be used as a framework for discovering and/or developing more competitive chickpea cultivars.

Methods: The virtual plant models were developed using the L-systems formalism, parameterized according to measurements taken on plants at intervals during their development. A quasi-Monte Carlo light-environment model was used to model the effect of chickpea canopy on the development of sowthistle. The chickpea-light environment-sowthistle model (CLES model) captured the hypothesis that the architecture of chickpea plants modifies the light environment inside the canopy and determines sowthistle growth and development pattern. The resulting CLES model was parameterized for different chickpea cultivars (viz. 'Macarena', 'Bumper', 'Jimbour' and '99071-1001') to compare their competitive ability with sowthistle. To validate the CLES model, an experiment was conducted using the same four chickpea cultivars as different treatments with a sowthistle growing under their canopy.

Results and conclusions: The growth of sowthistle, both in silico and in glasshouse experiments, was reduced most by '99071-1001', a cultivar with a short phyllochron. The second rank of competitive ability belonged to 'Macarena' and 'Bumper', while 'Jimbour' was the least competitive cultivar. The architecture of virtual chickpea plants modified the light inside the canopy, which influenced the growth and development of the sowthistle plants in response to different cultivars. This is the first time that a virtual plant model of a crop-weed interaction has been developed. This virtual plant model can serve as a platform for a broad range of applications in the study of chickpea-weed interactions and their environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1.
Fig. 1.
Side view of a virtual chickpea plant 15 and 60 d after germination, with the in silico thermal time set to 20 °C per day.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2.
Fig. 2.
The communication of the two virtual plant models with the QMC light-environment model. Information on polygon positions (chickpea leaflets and sowthistle sensor) is passed to the QMC light-environment model (1), which calculates light availability for a virtual sensor at the sowthistle location (2); information is transmitted to the sowthistle through the virtual sensor (3).
F<sc>ig</sc>. 3.
Fig. 3.
Visualizations taken from the CLES model, showing the effect of the different chickpea cultivars (green) or full light on sowthistle (red) over time. The plants on the left are at 40 d after germination and those on the right are at 70 d. The average in silico temperature was set to 20 °C per day.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 4.
Fig. 4.
Observed and simulated sowthistle bolting time (growing degree-days, GGD) as affected by different chickpea cultivars and full light. Values are means ± s.e.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 5.
Fig. 5.
Observed and simulated sowthistle growth index (SGI) as affected by different chickpea cultivars and full light. Values are means ± s.e.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 6.
Fig. 6.
The simulated height (70 d after germination) of sowthistle when growing with different types of chickpea architecture in the CLES model. R, reference line; treatment numbers indicate different simulated architectures as shown in Table 2.

References

    1. Aphalo PJ, Ballare CL. On the importance of information acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions. Functional Ecology. 1995;9:5–14.
    1. Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ, Kempuchetty N, Rajan A, Migo TR. Can simulation models help design rice cultivars that are more competitive against weed? Field Crop Research. 1997;51:101–111.
    1. Berman F, Fox G, Hey A. Grid computing, making the global infrastructure a reality. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley; 2003.
    1. Blackshaw RE, O'Donovan JT, Harker KN, Clayton GW, Stougaard RN. Reduced herbicide doses in field crops: a review. Weed Biology and Management. 2006;6:10–17.
    1. Carver RH. Doing data analysis with Minitab 14. Victoria: Thomson; 2004.

Publication types