Evaluation of different nucleic acid amplification techniques for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from patients with community-acquired pneumonia
- PMID: 18378345
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.010
Evaluation of different nucleic acid amplification techniques for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Abstract
The number of pathogens involved in community-acquired pneumonia, with varying susceptibilities to antimicrobials, is numerous constituting an enormous challenge for diagnostic microbiology. Differentiation of infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae and those due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, or L. pneumophila as well as those due to viruses is essential to allow correct decisions concerning the antibiotics to be administered. The sensitivity and specificity of real-time simplex and multiplex nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), and simplex PCR were compared for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from hospitalized and outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two hundred fifty one respiratory specimens were collected from 147 patients with CAP. NASBA was done using the NucliSens Basic Kit (bioMérieux). PCR for M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae was done as described earlier [Ieven, M., Ursi, D., Van Bever, H., Quint, W., Niesters, H. G. M., and Goossens, H. 1996. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and role of M. pneumoniae in acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. J. Infect. Dis. 173, 1445-14452.; Ursi, D., Ieven, M., Van Bever, H. P., and Goossens, H. 1998. Construction of an internal control for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae by PCR. Mol. Cellul. Probes. 12, 235-238.]. A real-time PCR was developed to detect L. pneumophila whereas a real-time NASBA was designed to detect Legionella spp. All samples with discordant results were re-analysed. Compared to an expanded gold standard the sensitivities of the different techniques, were 77.8%, 100%, and 100% for detection of M. pneumoniae; and 50%, 100%, and 50% for detection of L. pneumophila by PCR, real-time simplex NASBA, and real-time multiplex NASBA, respectively. C. pneumoniae was detected in two samples only. Simplex real-time NASBA proved to be more sensitive than simplex PCR and was also more sensitive than real-time multiplex NASBA, as previously found with spiked clinical specimens. It's practical attractiveness pleads for further optimalisation of the multiplex approach.
Similar articles
-
Development of real-time multiplex nucleic acid sequence-based amplification for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):185-91. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00447-07. Epub 2007 Nov 21. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18032625 Free PMC article.
-
Development and evaluation of Chlamylege, a new commercial test allowing simultaneous detection and identification of Legionella, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical respiratory specimens by multiplex PCR.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jul;43(7):3247-54. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3247-3254.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16000443 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the NucliSens miniMAG RNA extraction and real-time NASBA applications for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in throat swabs.J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Feb;72(2):217-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.11.008. Epub 2007 Nov 21. J Microbiol Methods. 2008. PMID: 18077024
-
[Community-acquired pneumonia: prospective study of 101 adult, immunocompetent patients for 1 year].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1993 Dec;11(10):525-30. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1993. PMID: 8142501 Review. Spanish.
-
[Atypical pneumonia].Orv Hetil. 2005 Aug 21;146(34):1759-66. Orv Hetil. 2005. PMID: 16184877 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Development of a DNA microarray assay for rapid detection of fifteen bacterial pathogens in pneumonia.BMC Microbiol. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01842-3. BMC Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32576241 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in point-of-care genetic testing for personalized medicine applications.Biomicrofluidics. 2023 May 3;17(3):031501. doi: 10.1063/5.0143311. eCollection 2023 May. Biomicrofluidics. 2023. PMID: 37159750 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the combination of the NucliSENS easyMAG and the EasyQ applications for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in respiratory tract specimens.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;29(2):187-90. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0839-9. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 19941020
-
Comparison of serological methods with PCR-based methods for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical bacteria.J Negat Results Biomed. 2016 Mar 2;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12952-016-0047-y. J Negat Results Biomed. 2016. PMID: 26932735 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila.Ann Lab Med. 2012 Mar;32(2):133-8. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.133. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Ann Lab Med. 2012. PMID: 22389880 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous