Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Apr;111(4):899-907.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a1e12.

High costs of urinary incontinence among women electing surgery to treat stress incontinence

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

High costs of urinary incontinence among women electing surgery to treat stress incontinence

Leslee L Subak et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate costs for incontinence management, health-related quality of life, and willingness to pay for incontinence improvement in women electing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Methods: A total of 655 incontinent women enrolled in the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial, a randomized surgical trial. Baseline out-of-pocket costs for incontinence management were calculated by multiplying self-report of resources used (supplies, laundry, dry cleaning) by national resource costs (USD2,006). Health-related quality of life was estimated with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3. Participants estimated willingness to pay for 100% improvement in incontinence. Potential predictors of these outcomes were examined by using multivariable linear regression.

Results: Mean age was 52+/-10 years, and mean number of weekly incontinence episodes was 22+/-21. Mean and median (25%, 75% interquartile range) estimated personal costs for incontinence management among all women were USD14+/-USD24 and USD8 (interquartile range USD3, USD18) per week, and 617 (94%) women reported any cost. Costs increased significantly with incontinence frequency and mixed compared with stress incontinence. The mean and median Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores were 0.73+/-0.25 and 0.84 (interquartile range 0.63, 0.92). Women were willing to pay a mean of USD118+/-USD132 per month for complete resolution of incontinence, and willingness to pay increased significantly with greater expected incontinence improvement, household income, and incontinent episode frequency.

Conclusion: Urinary incontinence is associated with substantial costs. Women spent nearly USD750 per year out of pocket for incontinence management, had a significant decrement in quality of life, and were willing to pay nearly USD1,400 per year for cure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Willingness to pay for alleviation of incontinence. The proportion of women willing to pay each dollar amount per month for 25%, 50%, and 100% reduction in incontinence frequency is depicted. Women were willing to pay more for greater expected reduction in incontinent episode frequency (P<.001 for trend). The dotted line is the current monthly cost for incontinence management for all women in the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy trial (SISTEr) ($61 per month) and dashed line is the mean willingness to pay per month for incontinence cure ($118 per month).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean of Health Utilities Index (HUI3) scores in published population-based, cross-sectional studies of chronic health conditions. The shaded bar is the mean HUI3 score observed in the current study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A.The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile [published erratum appears in J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:976–7]. J Am Geriatr Soc 199139378–82. - PubMed
    1. Mittmann N, Trakas K, Risebrough N, Liu BA. Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:369–76. - PubMed
    1. Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, Luc KO, Subak LL. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:398–406. - PubMed
    1. Dowell CJ, Bryant CM, Moore KH, Simons AM. Calculating the direct costs of urinary incontinence: a new test instrument. BJU Int. 1999;83:596–606. - PubMed
    1. McClish DK, Wyman JF, Sale PG, Camp J, Earle B.Use and costs of incontinence pads in female study volunteers. Continence Program for Women Research Group J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 199926207–8., 210-3. - PubMed

Publication types