Similar articles

• Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

  Anglen JO, Weinstein JN; American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Research Committee. Anglen JO, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):700-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00517. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18381305
• Geographic variation in device use for intertrochanteric hip fractures.

  Forte ML, Virnig BA, Kane RL, Durham S, Bhandari M, Feldman R, Swiontkowski MF. Forte ML, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):691-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00414. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18381304
• Symposium: introducing technology into orthopaedic practice. How should it be done?

  Callaghan JJ, Crowninshield RD, Greenwald AS, Lieberman JR, Rosenberg AG, Lewallen DG. Callaghan JJ, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1146-58. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00116. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005. PMID: 15866982 No abstract available.
• Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

  Sambandam SN, Chandrasekharan J, Mounasamy V, Mauffrey C. Sambandam SN, et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 May;26(4):339-53. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1757-z. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016. PMID: 27028746 Review. No abstract available.
• Health care technology assessment. Basic principles and clinical applications.

  Bozic KJ, Pierce RG, Herndon JH. Bozic KJ, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun;86(6):1305-14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. PMID: 15173308 Review.