Characteristics of general and subspecialty pediatricians who choose not to recertify
- PMID: 18381535
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1956
Characteristics of general and subspecialty pediatricians who choose not to recertify
Abstract
Objective: The goal was to determine the reasons given for nonparticipation in maintenance of certification by general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists whose board certification had expired.
Methods: All United States-based pediatricians whose board certification had expired and who had not recertified as a generalist or subspecialist in 2004 or 2005 were surveyed. The total sample included 1001 pediatric generalists and 1237 subspecialists. We conducted a mail survey study, with a total of 3 mailings to nonrespondents. Analyses initially were conducted separately for generalists with expired certificates, subspecialists with active subspecialty but expired general pediatrics certificates, and subspecialists with expired subspecialty certificates (regardless of their general pediatrics certification status).
Results: The overall response rates were 68% for generalists and 76% for subspecialists. Of pediatricians who had allowed their certificates to expire, the majority still intended to recertify (65% of the generalists and 86% of the subspecialists, in their primary subspecialty). The most common reasons cited by the 35% of generalists with expired certificates who were not planning to participate in maintenance of certification were the expense, the time required to complete maintenance of certification, and the perceived lack of relevance to their current practice. The 14% of subspecialists who were not planning to recertify in their primary subspecialty most commonly cited the expense, a change in career path making recertification unnecessary, and the time required.
Conclusions: Although the physicians in this study had allowed their certificates to expire, they still overwhelmingly believed that physicians who provide direct patient care should maintain their certification. There was general consensus among our respondents regarding the professional value to patients and peers of participation in the maintenance of certification program.
Similar articles
-
Recently trained general pediatricians: perspectives on residency training and scope of practice.Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123 Suppl 1:S38-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1578J. Pediatrics. 2009. PMID: 19088244
-
Permanent pediatric diplomate awareness of and perspectives on maintenance of certification.J Pediatr. 2009 Dec;155(6):919-923.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.046. Epub 2009 Oct 20. J Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19846113
-
A medical home for children with insulin-dependent diabetes: comanagement by primary and subspecialty physicians--convergence and divergence of opinions.Pediatrics. 2008 Aug;122(2):e383-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3761. Pediatrics. 2008. PMID: 18676524
-
American osteopathic association commitment to quality and lifelong learning.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Sep;105(9):404-7. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005. PMID: 16239490 Review.
-
Certification in neurodevelopmental disabilities: the development of a new subspecialty and results of the initial examinations.Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(2):128-31. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10069. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003. PMID: 12784231 Review.
Cited by
-
Board certification and urban-rural migration of physicians in Japan.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3441-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30086762 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Attrition From Family Medicine Board Certification.Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jan;16(1):55-58. doi: 10.1370/afm.2176. Ann Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 29311176 Free PMC article.
-
Family physician participation in maintenance of certification.Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):203-10. doi: 10.1370/afm.1251. Ann Fam Med. 2011. PMID: 21706905 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical