Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;98(5):876-81.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.111468. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Effects of enrollment in medicaid versus the state children's health insurance program on kindergarten children's untreated dental caries

Tegwyn H Brickhouse  1 , R Gary Rozier, Gary D Slade
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of enrollment in medicaid versus the state children's health insurance program on kindergarten children's untreated dental caries

Tegwyn H Brickhouse et al. Am J Public Health. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objectives: We compared levels of untreated dental caries in children enrolled in public insurance programs with those in nonenrolled children to determine the impact of public dental insurance and the type of plan (Medicaid vs State Children's Health Insurance Program [SCHIP]) on untreated dental caries in children.

Methods: Dental health outcomes were obtained through a calibrated oral screening of kindergarten children (enrolled in the 2000-2001 school year). We obtained eligibility and claims data for children enrolled in Medicaid and SCHIP who were eligible for dental services during 1999 to 2000. We developed logistic regression models to compare children's likelihood and extent of untreated dental caries according to enrollment.

Results: Children enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP were 1.7 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65, 1.77) more likely to have untreated dental caries than were nonenrolled children. SCHIP-enrolled children were significantly less likely to have untreated dental caries than were Medicaid-enrolled children (odds ratio [OR]=0.74; 95% CI=0.67, 0.82). According to a 2-part regression model, children enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP have 17% more untreated dental caries than do nonenrolled children, whereas those in SCHIP had 16% fewer untreated dental caries than did those in Medicaid.

Conclusions: Untreated tooth decay continues to be a significant problem for children with public insurance coverage. Children who participated in a separate SCHIP program had fewer untreated dental caries than did children enrolled in Medicaid.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schneider D, Crall JJ, Allen JS, Hayes K. State Innovations to Improve Dental Access for Low-Income Children: A Compendium. Chicago, IL: American Dental Association. Available at: http://www.ada.org/goto/medicaid. Accessed January 9, 2008.
    1. Kaiser State Health Facts Online. SCHIP program type. Available at: http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparemaptable.jsp?cat=4&ind=238. Accessed January 26, 2007.
    1. Georgetown University Center for Children and Families. Too close to turn back: covering America’s children. Building on the success of children’s coverage through SCHIP and Medicaid. Available at: http://ccf.georgetown.edu/pdfs/121206tooclosereport.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2007.
    1. Almeida RA, Hill I, Kenney GM. Does SCHIP Spell Better Dental Care Access for Children? An Early Look at New Initiatives. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2000.
    1. Shulman S, Kell M, Rosenbach M. SCHIP takes a bite out of the dental access gap for low-income children. Mathematic Policy Research, Inc. MPR Ref. No. 8644-200. Available at: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/schipdental.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms