Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;98(12):2214-22.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107102. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project

Ricardo J Wray  1 , Steven M Becker, Neil Henderson, Deborah Glik, Keri Jupka, Sarah Middleton, Carson Henderson, Allison Drury, Elizabeth W Mitchell
Affiliations

Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project

Ricardo J Wray et al. Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to better understand the challenges of communicating with the public about emerging health threats, particularly threats involving toxic chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive materials.

Methods: At the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium of investigative teams from 4 schools of public health. Over 2 years, the investigative teams conducted 79 focus group interviews with 884 participants and individual cognitive response interviews with 129 respondents, for a total sample of 1013 individuals. The investigative teams systematically compared their results with other published research in public health, risk communication, and emergency preparedness.

Results: We found limited public understanding of emerging biological, chemical, and radioactive materials threats and of the differences between them; demand for concrete, accurate, and consistent information about actions needed for protection of self and family; active information seeking from media, local authorities, and selected national sources; and areas in which current emergency messaging can be improved.

Conclusions: The public will respond to a threat situation by seeking protective information and taking self-protective action, underlining the critical role of effective communication in public health emergencies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tierney K, Lindell M, Perry R. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press; 1999
    1. Landesman L, Malilay J, Bissell R, Becker S, Roberts L, Ascher M. Roles and responsibilities of public health in disaster preparedness and response. Novick L, ed. Public Health Administration Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 2000:646–708
    1. Mileti D, Sorensen J. Communication of emergency public warnings: a social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Colorado State University; August 1990. Report No. ORNL-6609
    1. Koplan J. Communication during public health emergencies. J Health Commun 2003;8(suppl 1):144–145 - PubMed
    1. Becker S. Psychosocial effects of radiation accidents. Gusev I, Guskova A, Mettler F, Medical Management of Radiation Accidents. 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:519–525

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources