Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1509-12.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6816.1509.

Injuries from antipersonnel mines: the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross

Affiliations

Injuries from antipersonnel mines: the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross

R M Coupland et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1509

Abstract

Objective: To describe and quantify patterns of injury from antipersonnel mines in terms of distribution of injury, drain on surgical resources, and residual disability.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Two hospitals for patients injured in war.

Subjects: 757 patients with injuries from antipersonnel mines.

Main outcome measures: Distribution and number of injuries; number of blood transfusions; number of operations; disability.

Results: Pattern 1 injury results from standing on a buried mine. These patients usually sustain traumatic amputation of the foot or leg; they use most surgical time and blood and invariably require surgical amputation of one or both lower limbs. Pattern 2 injury is a more random collection of penetrating injuries caused by multiple fragments from a mine triggered near the victim. The lower limb is injured but there is less chance of traumatic amputation or subsequent surgical amputation. Injuries to the head, neck, chest, or abdomen are common. Pattern 3 injury results from handling a mine: the victim sustains severe upper limb injuries with associated face injuries. Eye injuries are common in all groups.

Conclusions: Patients who survive standing on a buried mine have greatest disability. Non-combatants are at risk from these weapons; in developing countries their social and economic prospects after recovery from amputation are poor.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Trauma. 1988 Jan;28(1 Suppl):S159-62 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Nov;71(6):405-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1968 Jul;97(1):1-15 - PubMed
    1. Mil Med. 1981 Oct;146(10):682-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources