Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence
- PMID: 18384633
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07608.x
Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence
Abstract
Objective: To report an increase in the referral of patients with disabling complications after the failure of conservative therapy, their presentation, final surgical management and clinical outcome, following the use of non-autologous slings (NAS), currently the primary surgical procedure for managing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
Patient and methods: Thirty-eight patients (mean age 64 years) required surgical management for disabling complications after placing a NAS for SUI. Sling types were synthetic (25), xenografts (six) and allografts (four). Twenty (53%) patients presented with bladder outlet obstruction, 13 (34%) with sling erosion, three (8%) with worsened SUI, and two (5%) with unobstructive severe urgency and frequency.
Results: The sling was dissected and incised with no complication in 19 of 20 patients. One had a posterior urethral defect during sling dissection. Twelve patients (60%) acquired normal voiding and were continent. Among the 13 patients who had the sling dismantled and urethrolysis, two had recurrent or persistent SUI, two de-novo urgency/frequency and one developed osteitis pubis. Three patients with disabling SUI received a pubovaginal sling placed proximal to the bladder neck, and had an overall improvement in their urinary control with no retention. Two unobstructed patients with urgency and frequency did not improve with anticholinergic medication and pelvic floor therapy, and are now candidates for botulinum toxin injection or neurostimulation.
Conclusions: The complication rate with periurethral NAS for managing SUI in females is substantial. Patients with refractory urgency/frequency after the sling need a complete evaluation with cystoscopy and video-urodynamics. Obstruction and erosion are the commonest problems and require surgical correction.
Similar articles
-
[Obstruction following surgical repair of female stress urinary incontinence. Diagnosis and treatment].Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Nov;55(9):1107-14. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12564070 Spanish.
-
Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence.Int J Urol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1076-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01909.x. Int J Urol. 2007. PMID: 18036043
-
[Comparative study among autologous and synthetic slings in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence].Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):469-73. Minerva Ginecol. 2008. PMID: 18981974 Italian.
-
Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.029. Epub 2008 Sep 17. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18801499 Review.
-
Outlet obstruction after sling surgery.BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108 Suppl 2:24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10712.x. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 22085122 Review.
Cited by
-
Does bladder wall thickness decrease when obstruction is resolved?Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep;23(9):1239-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1642-6. Epub 2012 Jan 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22249277
-
Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.Indian J Urol. 2012 Apr;28(2):129-53. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.98453. Indian J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22919127 Free PMC article.
-
Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Sep;12(9):481-509. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.183. Epub 2015 Aug 18. Nat Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 26282209 Review.
-
Vaginal Mesh Exposure Presentation, Evaluation, and Management.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Sep;17(9):65. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0617-z. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27448146 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical