Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;34(6):627-38.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn033. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS)

Affiliations

Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS)

Beth N Peshkin et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk (BRCA1/2 testing) is not recommended for minor children due to its lack of immediate medical benefit and potential psychological risk. Yet, tested mothers are often interested in learning about their children's cancer risks via pediatric BRCA1/2 testing, raising a host of bioethical concerns. However, no reliable or valid tool exists to formally gauge parents' interest in such testing. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new measure for use in genetic research and consultation, known as the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Methods: After pretest genetic counseling and provision of a blood sample for BRCA1/2 testing, the P-TAS was administered to 187 mothers of children between 8- and 21-years-old. The measure was also given to 96 of the mothers' nontested co-parents. Analyses of the factor structure and psychometric properties of the measure were performed in mothers and confirmed in their co-parents.

Results: The two factors of the P-TAS, labeled Attitudes and Beliefs (Factor 1) and Decision Making and Communication (Factor 2), accounted for 62.9% of the variance and were reliable (Cronbach's coefficient alphas =.70 and .90, respectively); the structure and properties were largely confirmed among co-parents. Validity was indicated through its convergence with related constructs.

Conclusions: This new tool may be integrated into genetic counseling research to better assess parents' attitudes and interests in pediatric BRCA1/2 testing. Such information may help guide ongoing discussions about the appropriateness of testing in adolescent or young adult children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:2397–2406. - PubMed
    1. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. Points to consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1995;57:1233–1241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borry P, Stultiens L, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: A systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clinical Genetics. 2006;70:374–381. - PubMed
    1. Borry P, Goffin T, Nys H. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics, 148. 2008. Attitudes regarding predictive genetic testing in minors. A survey of European clinical geneticists. pp. 78–83. - PubMed
    1. Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Pawlowski K, Ibe CN, Cummings SA, Olopade O, et al. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics, 148. 2008. Should genetic testing for BRCA1/2 be permitted for minors? Opinions of BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring; pp. 70–77. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms