Impaired search for orientation but not color in hemi-spatial neglect
- PMID: 18387532
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2005.10.001
Impaired search for orientation but not color in hemi-spatial neglect
Abstract
Patients with hemi-spatial neglect have trouble finding targets defined by a conjunction of visual features. The problem is widely believed to stem from a high-level deficit in attentional deployment, which in turn has led to disagreement over whether the detection of basic features is also disrupted. If one assumes that the detection of salient visual features can be based on the output of spared 'preattentive' processes (Treisman and Gelade, 1980), then feature detection should remain intact. However, if one assumes that all forms of detection require at least a modicum of focused attention (Duncan and Humphreys, 1992), then all forms of search will be disrupted to some degree. Here we measured the detection of feature targets that were defined by either a unique color or orientation. Comparable detection rates were observed in non-neglected space, which indicated that both forms of search placed similar demands on attention. For either of the above accounts to be true, the two targets should therefore be detected with equal efficiency in the neglected field. We found that while the detection rate for color was normal in four of our five patients, all showed an increased reaction time and/or error rate for orientation. This result points to a selective deficit in orientation discrimination, and implies that neglect disrupts specific feature representations. That is, the effects of neglect on visual search are not only attentional but also perceptual.
Comment in
-
Are results from different techniques mutually exclusive in the study of how the brain processes visual search?Cortex. 2008 Jan;44(1):99-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.06.002. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Cortex. 2008. PMID: 18387537 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):788-99. doi: 10.1162/0898929053747676. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 15904545
-
Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16859421
-
Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):869-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.020. Epub 2008 Dec 30. Neuropsychologia. 2009. PMID: 19154749
-
Time and neglect: abnormal temporal dynamics in unilateral spatial neglect.Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 31. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16876831 Review.
-
View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.Cogn Psychol. 2009 Feb;58(1):1-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jul 23. Cogn Psychol. 2009. PMID: 18653176 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources