Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study
- PMID: 18390496
- PMCID: PMC2292334
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39518.463206.25
Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the feasibility of applying a high throughput method, with an automated robotic technique, for predicting fetal RhD phenotype from fetal DNA in the plasma of RhD negative pregnant women to avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-RhD immunoglobulin.
Design: Prospective comparison of fetal RHD genotype determined from fetal DNA in maternal plasma with the serologically determined fetal RhD phenotype from cord blood.
Setting: Antenatal clinics and antenatal testing laboratories in the Midlands and north of England and an international blood group reference laboratory.
Participants: Pregnant women of known gestation identified as RhD negative by an antenatal testing laboratory. Samples from 1997 women were taken at or before the 28 week antenatal visit.
Main outcome measures: Detection rate of fetal RhD from maternal plasma, error rate, false positive rate, and the odds of being affected given a positive result.
Results: Serologically determined RhD phenotypes were obtained from 1869 cord blood samples. In 95.7% (n=1788) the correct fetal RhD phenotype was predicted by the genotyping tests. In 3.4% (n=64) results were either unobtainable or inconclusive. A false positive result was obtained in 0.8% (14 samples), probably because of unexpressed or weakly expressed fetal RHD genes. In only three samples (0.2%) were false negative results obtained. If these results had been applied as a guide to treatment, only 2% of the women would have received anti-RhD unnecessarily, compared with 38% without the genotyping.
Conclusions: High throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses in all RhD negative women is feasible and would substantially reduce unnecessary administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin to RhD negative pregnant women with an RhD negative fetus.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Universal RHD genotyping in fetuses.BMJ. 2008 Apr 12;336(7648):783-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39533.358252.BE. Epub 2008 Apr 3. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18390495 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal RHD typing: Is fetal RHD typing in all RhD negative women cost effective?BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):906. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39556.499549.80. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18436926 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Walker W, Murray S, Russell JK. Stillbirth due to haemolytic disease of the newborn. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957;44:573-81. - PubMed
-
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance 41. Guidance on the use of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women London: NICE, 2002
-
- Daniels G. Human blood groups 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2002
-
- Kenny-Walsh E. Clinical outcomes after hepatitis C infection from contaminated anti-D immune globulin. New Engl J Med 1999;340:1228-33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical