Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;31(2):188-94.
doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181595af6.

Anticancer effect of combination therapy of VP16 and fosfesterol in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Affiliations

Anticancer effect of combination therapy of VP16 and fosfesterol in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Haruhito Azuma et al. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted the present study to evaluate the safety profile and therapeutic value of a combination of etoposide and fosfestrol for treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

Methods: Forty patients with HRPC were included in the study. The median age was 71 years (range, 50-86 years), the Gleason's score ranged from 5 to 10, and the median prostate-specific antigen level was 62.6 ng/mL (range, 4.738-30789 ng/mL). The patients received oral etoposide 25 mg/d and fosfestrol 300 mg/d.

Results: The response rate in terms of measurable disease, serum prostate-specific antigen level, and overall evaluation was 36.8% (CR: 18.4%; PR: 18.4%), 80% (CR: 55%; PR: 25%), and 40% (CR: 20%; PR: 20%) with a median duration of response of 13.6, 13.5, and 13.5 months, respectively. An objective clinical response for overall evaluation was shown by 90% (CR: 20%; PR: 20%; SD: 50%) of the patients, with a median response duration of 15.7 months; 16 patients (40%) are currently alive without recurrence after a median follow-up period of 21.2 months. The overall survival and progression-free survival was 30.5% and 28.8% at 40 months, respectively. No grade III toxicities occurred in any of the patients. Serial measurements in 34 patients using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate showed a significant improvement in quality of life as a result of the therapy.

Conclusions: The combination of oral etoposide and fosfestrol is active in patients with HRPC. The regimen is tolerable and has a significant impact on quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate in a limited sample of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms