Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2008 May;17(4):497-507.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9336-3.

Health-related quality of life following blind rehabilitation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Health-related quality of life following blind rehabilitation

Thomas Kuyk et al. Qual Life Res. 2008 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of residential blind rehabilitation on patients' vision-targeted health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and general physical and mental function.

Method: The National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ) plus appendix questions, the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Hope Scale and Coopersmith self-esteem inventory were administered to 206 legally blind veterans prior to their entering a residential (in-patient) blind rehabilitation program and again to 185 and 176 of the original cohort at 2 and 6 months after completion of the rehabilitation program, respectively. Data on visual acuity, visual field extent, contrast sensitivity and scanning ability were also collected. The duration of the in-patient rehabilitation programs ranged from 11 to 109 days. Questionnaire scores were compared pre-rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation.

Results: Following rehabilitation there was a significant improvement in nine of 11 NEI VFQ subscales and in a composite score at both the 2- and 6-month post-rehabilitation intervals. Mental health (SF-12) and self esteem also improved significantly although physical health ratings declined over the course of the study (approximately 10 months).

Conclusions: Residential blind rehabilitation appears to improve patients' self-reported vision-targeted HRQOL, self-esteem and mental health aspects of generic HRQOL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in NEI VFQ subscale scores for pre rehabilitation to 2- and 6-months post rehabilitation and between 2 and 6-months post rehabilitation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Assessing health related quality of life for clinical decision making. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM, editors. Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990’s. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993. pp. 11–63.
    1. Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, et al. Quality of life measures in health care, II: design, analysis, and interpretation. British Medical Journal. 1992;305:1145–1148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fowler FL, Cleary PD. Methodological issues in measuring patient-reported outcomes: The agenda of the work group on outcomes assessment. Medical Care. 1994;32:JS65–JS76. - PubMed
    1. Ellwein LB, Fletcher A, Negrel AD, Thulasiraj RD. Quality of life assessment in blindness prevention interventions. International Ophthalmology. 1994;18:263–268. - PubMed
    1. Raasch TW, Leat SJ, Kleinstein RN, Bullimore MA, Cutter GR. Evaluating the value of low vision services. Journal of the American Optometric Assocciation. 1997;68:287–295. - PubMed

Publication types