Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jun;24(6):1121-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0812-3. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners

Affiliations
Review

Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners

Deepa H Chand et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Recent data indicate that the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in pediatric patients (age 0-19 years) has increased over the past two decades. Similarly, the prevalence of ESRD has increased threefold over the same period. Hemodialysis (HD) continues to be the most frequently utilized modality for renal replacement therapy in incident pediatric ESRD patients. The number of children on HD exceeded the sum total of those on peritoneal dialysis and those undergoing pre-emptive renal transplantation. Choosing the best vascular access option for pediatric HD patients remains challenging. Despite a national initiative for fistula first in the adult hemodialysis population, the pediatric nephrology community in the United States of America utilizes central venous catheters as the primary dialysis access for most patients. Vascular access management requires proper advance planning to assure that the best permanent access is placed, seamless communication involving a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, nurses, surgeons, and interventional radiologists, and ongoing monitoring to ensure a long life of use. It is imperative that practitioners have a long-term vision to decrease morbidity in this unique patient population. This article reviews the various types of pediatric vascular accesses used worldwide and the benefits and disadvantages of these various forms of access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Renal Data System (2006) Annual data report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2006
    1. National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30:S150–S191. - PubMed
    1. North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) (2006) Annual Report. Dialysis Access data. Available at https://doi.org/web.emmes.com/study/ped/annlrept/annlrept.html - PubMed
    1. Quinton W, Dillard D, Scribner BH. Cannulation of blood vessels for prolonged hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1960;6:104–113. - PubMed
    1. Franzone AJ, Tucker BL, Brennan LP, Fine RN, Stiles QR. Hemodialysis in children. Experience with arteriovenous shunts. Arch Surg. 1971;102:592–593. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350060056016. - DOI - PubMed