Response pattern asymmetry of binocular vision vertical fusion amplitudes in a normal population
- PMID: 18393936
Response pattern asymmetry of binocular vision vertical fusion amplitudes in a normal population
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the maximum vertical fusion amplitudes in vertical directions (response pattern by respective higher eye), to investigate for possible asymmetry.
Methods: Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) was measured in one hundred normal adults with normal single binocular vision using a computer based device that produced a gradually increasing, but optically distant test distance, Vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical left- over-right (L/R, elevation of the left eye above the right eye) pattern direction were compared to the vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical right-over-left direction pattern(R/L).
Results: The mean VFA was 4.08 +/-1.01 prism diopters, with vertical fusion amplitudes of 4.40 +/-1.44 prism diopters in the L/R direction and 3.75 +/-1.19 prism diopters in the R/L direction. There was no association between ocular dominance and the direction of greater VFA. Asymmetry in the vertical fusion response was found, with 77/100 subjects showing greater than a 10% difference between the means of the L/R and R/L measurements. The group with asymmetry had 17% greater mean VFA than the symmetric group.
Conclusion: Normal adults frequently have asymmetric directional vertical fusion amplitudes. The asymmetry appears to be due to the contribution of the direction with the greater VFA, rather than the result of both alternatives. These results are intriguing and bear further investigation. Possible explanations my be asymmetry of orbital anatomy or functional asymmetry of either muscular or neuronal origin. They do not appear to be due to the relative ocular dominance. Inherent VFA asymmetry should therefore be considered in all forms of vergence testing in the vertical direction.
Similar articles
-
Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.Vision Res. 2006 Aug;46(16):2608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.023. Epub 2006 Mar 10. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16530245
-
Changes in Listing's plane after sustained vertical fusion.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Mar;43(3):668-72. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002. PMID: 11867582
-
A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 May;46(5):1786-90. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0954. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. PMID: 15851583
-
Neuromuscular plasticity and rehabilitation of the ocular near response.Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;86(7):E788-802. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae00a5. Optom Vis Sci. 2009. PMID: 19543139 Review.
-
Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Nov;24(6):528-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00234.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004. PMID: 15491481 Review.
Cited by
-
The decompensated monofixation syndrome (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011 Dec;109:232-50. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011. PMID: 22253490 Free PMC article.
-
Vertical vergence in nonhuman primates depends on horizontal gaze position.Strabismus. 2019 Sep;27(3):172-181. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1629465. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Strabismus. 2019. PMID: 31223057 Free PMC article.