An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a 4.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones
- PMID: 18394077
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00379.x
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a 4.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones
Abstract
Objectives: To compare monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a 5.5 mm broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate (5.5-LC-DCP) fixation with a 4.5 mm broad LC-DCP (4.5-LC-DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.
Study design: In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation.
Sample population: Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=18 pair).
Methods: MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (6 pairs each) for: (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing; (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing; and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. The 8-hole, 5.5 mm broad LC-DCP (5.5-LC-DCP) was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. One 8-hole, 4.5 mm broad LC-DCP (4.5-LC-DCP) was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05.
Results: Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment under 4-point bending, single cycle to failure, of the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.024) than those of the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure for 4-point bending was significantly (P<.05) greater for the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation compared with the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load in torsion for the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation was not significantly different (P>.05) than those with the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation.
Conclusion: 5.5-LC-DCP fixation was superior to 4.5-LC-DCP fixation in resisting the static overload forces under palmarodorsal 4-point bending. There was no significant difference between 5.5-LC-DCP fixation and 4.5-LC-DCP fixation in resisting static overload forces under torsion; however, the 5.5-LC-DCP offers significantly less stability (80% of that of the 4.5-LC-DCP) in cyclic fatigue testing.
Clinical relevance: The results of this in vitro study may provide information to aid in the selection of a biological plate for long bone fracture repair in horses.
Similar articles
-
In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.Vet Surg. 2008 Apr;37(3):283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00378.x. Vet Surg. 2008. PMID: 18394076
-
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.Vet Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):579-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00092.x. Vet Surg. 2005. PMID: 16343145
-
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a prototype equine metacarpal dynamic compression plate fixation with double dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.Vet Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):594-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00093.x. Vet Surg. 2005. PMID: 16343147
-
[Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP)--biomechanical research as basis to new plate design].Orthopade. 1992 Feb;21(1):11-23. Orthopade. 1992. PMID: 1549332 Review. German.
-
The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Scientific background, design and application.Injury. 1991;22 Suppl 1:1-41. Injury. 1991. PMID: 1806522 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous