Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients hospitalized with heart failure and normal ejection fraction (> or =55%) versus those with mildly reduced (40% to 55%) and moderately to severely reduced (<40%) fractions
- PMID: 18394450
- PMCID: PMC2390999
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.014
Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients hospitalized with heart failure and normal ejection fraction (> or =55%) versus those with mildly reduced (40% to 55%) and moderately to severely reduced (<40%) fractions
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) with normal ejection fraction (EF) is an increasingly common presentation of acute decompensated HF. Differences between patients with HF and truly normal EF and those with mildly impaired EF have not been described. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Registry (ADHERE) contains information on >100,000 HF hospitalizations and may provide insight into this distinction. The ADHERE database was used to investigate differences between patients hospitalized with HF and severely (<25%), moderately (25% to 40%), and mildly (40% to 55%) decreased EF and those with normal EF (> or =55%). The group with normal EF was 69% women with a mean age of 74 years (p <0.0001 vs all other groups). Coronary artery disease was less frequent in the normal EF group, and hypertension played a larger role. Patients with EF > or =55% had increased pulse pressure, suggesting a role for arterial stiffening. Treatment differed by EF. Creatinine increased > or =0.5 mg/dl more often in the group with HF and normal EF than in the group with HF and severely decreased EF. In-hospital mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit varied inversely with EF; overall length of stay was similar. In conclusion, patients with HF and normal EF are more likely to be women, have a history of high pulse pressure hypertension, less coronary artery disease, and a lower risk of inpatient death but a higher likelihood of deterioration in renal function during hospitalization. These observations may be important considerations in the design of future clinical trials.
Figures
References
-
- Kitzman DW, Little WC, Brubaker PH, Anderson RT, Hundley WG, Marburger CT, Brosnihan B, Morgan TM, Stewart KP. Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure. JAMA. 2002;288:2144–2150. - PubMed
-
- Zile MR, Baicu CF, Gaasch WH. Diastolic heart failure--abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1953–1959. - PubMed
-
- Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet. 2003;362:777–781. - PubMed
-
- Margulies KB, Fiss DM, Jung AS, Bratinov G, Marble J. Abnormal rate-dependent contractile reserve in heart failure-with normal ejection fraction. J Card Fail. 2004;10:S25.
-
- Kozakova M, Fraser AG, Buralli S, Magagna A, Salvetti A, Ferrannini E, Palombo C. Reduced left ventricular functional reserve in hypertensive patients with preserved function at rest. Hypertension. 2005;45:619–624. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
