Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 May;51(4):284-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

[Does exercise therapy for chronic lower-back pain require daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles?]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Does exercise therapy for chronic lower-back pain require daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles?]

[Article in French]
N Olivier et al. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of a functional retraining programme (with or without daily isokinetic reinforcement of the trunk muscles) in patients with lower-back pain.

Method: Two groups of 30 patients took part in the study. The control group (CG) underwent a four-week reconditioning program in a day hospital, whereas a second interventional group (IG) additionally performed daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles. Three evaluations were carried out: before hospitalization (T1), immediately after hospitalization (T2) and three months postrehabilitation (T3).

Results: We observed an improvement in each parameter after rehabilitation, regardless of the group. A decrease in the DALLAS scores revealed a reduced impact of lower-back pain on the patients' lives. Pain experienced fell by 24%, analgesic treatment was significantly decreased (CG: -53%; IG: -56%), muscle endurance was improved (quadriceps: +30%, abdominal muscles: +20%, paraspinal muscles: +23%, quadratus lumborum: +33%) and the patients were more supple, as revealed by a decrease in the finger-to-ground distance (at T1, CG: 12.9+/-6.1cm; IG: 13.6+/-5.5 cm at T1; CG: 2.2+/-5.4 cm; IG: 2.8+/-5.1cm at T2). The sole difference for CG and IG at T2 resulted from an improvement in the performance of the trunk extensor muscles, which was significantly greater in the IG (CG: +14%; IG: +20%). Three months after rehabilitation, the benefits were still present for the two groups and, indeed, were even greater for certain parameters.

Conclusion: Regardless of the protocol, the patients improved in both physical and psychological terms and these improvements were maintained over a short period, at least. Our results confirmed that one functional recovery programme is not superior to another for patients with lower-back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources