Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays
- PMID: 18395539
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60063-3
Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays
Erratum in
- J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jun;99(6):476. Farrrell, Charles V [corrected to Farrell, Charles V]
Abstract
Statement of problem: The standard cement for partial-veneer cast gold restorations has been zinc phosphate. With increasing interest in using resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cements for this purpose, marginal adaptation with use of these newer cements must be assessed.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine if the marginal adaptation of cast gold inlays is comparable for 3 different luting agents and 3 finishing techniques.
Material and methods: Cast gold inlays were cemented into triangular preparations on the buccal surface of 45 extracted human molars. Three operators each used a different technique for finishing margins: finishing during cementation (FD), finishing before cementation (FB), and finishing before and during cementation (FBA). The 15 teeth for each operator were divided into 3 subgroups of 5 each to accommodate 3 cements: zinc phosphate (Fleck's zinc phosphate: ZP), resin-modified glass ionomer (RelyX Luting: RXL), and self-adhesive modified resin (RelyX Unicem: RXU). For all specimens, fine sandpaper disks followed by fine cuttle disks were used for finishing the castings. The marginal gap was measured using a Nikon measuring microscope at x50 magnification. Data were analyzed with a 1-way ANOVA for each cement (alpha=.05).
Results: There were significant differences among finishing techniques for each cement (P<.05). For ZP, the smallest mean marginal gaps were for FD (31 microm) and FBA (42 microm). For RXL, FBA produced the smallest gap (19 microm). For RXU, FB (23 microm) and FBA (22 microm) were optimal.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the marginal gap attained with cementation of partial-veneer cast gold restorations with ZP (31 microm) can also be obtained using RXL or RXU. The techniques of FD or FBA are best used for ZP, whereas the FBA technique is best for RXL, and either FB or FBA is optimal for RXU. The FBA technique yielded a small gap; this was common to all 3 cements.
Similar articles
-
Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00398.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18. J Prosthodont. 2009. PMID: 19054303
-
An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99032. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22842244 Clinical Trial.
-
Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60030-X. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18262015
-
Cements for use in esthetic dentistry.Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;51(2):453-71, x. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.02.003. Dent Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 17532922 Review.
-
Contemporary evaluation of dental cements.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999 Mar;20(3):197-9, 202-8, 210 passim; quiz 220. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999. PMID: 11692331 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro Evaluation of the Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns: Micro-CT Comparison Between Different Manufacturing Procedures.Open Dent J. 2018 Feb 22;12:160-172. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010160. eCollection 2018. Open Dent J. 2018. PMID: 29854014 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the mechanical properties of dental adhesives and glass-ionomer cements.Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Feb;14(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0259-3. Epub 2009 Feb 25. Clin Oral Investig. 2010. PMID: 19241096
-
Evaluating the effect of repeated use of milling burs on surface roughness and adaptation of digitally fabricated ceramic veneers.Heliyon. 2021 Apr 30;7(4):e06896. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06896. eCollection 2021 Apr. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33997414 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous