[Therapeutic consequences of thrombophilic testing]

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this article are to review the data about the consequences of thrombophilia testing and to think about its indications.

Current knowledge and key points: The indications of congenital thrombophilic testing have extended since the discovery of prevalent abnormalities, such as mutations of factor V or II genes. However, thrombophilia does not result in a significant increase in the risk of recurrence unlike the spontaneous occurrence of thrombotic events. The factor V Leiden mutation is associated with a moderate increase in recurrence rate, while the G20210A mutation of factor II is not associated with a significant increase in recurrence. Regarding the decrease in natural anticoagulants is concerned, there is no definite conclusion, although the decrease in antithrombin is suspected of being associated with an increase in recurrence.

Future prospects and projects: Finally, identification of a constitutional thrombophilia most often do not influence the therapeutic decisions unless some rare abnormalities are found, such as a decrease in antithrombin, homozygous mutations in factors V or II genes or associations of thrombophilia. One must remember that antiphospholipid antibodies must be searched because their impact on recurrences is well-known. Diagnostic work-up for thrombophilia is not useful after a distal or a superficial venous thrombosis (except for antiphospholipid antibodies in case of distal venous thrombosis).