Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;123(4):2172-90.
doi: 10.1121/1.2839138.

Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans

Affiliations

Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans

Michael P Gorga et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression (quantified as decrements) was measured for f(2)=500 and 4000 Hz, for a range of primary levels (L(2)), suppressor frequencies (f(3)), and suppressor levels (L(3)) in 19 normal-hearing subjects. Slopes of decrement-versus-L(3) functions were similar at both f(2) frequencies, and decreased as f(3) increased. Suppression tuning curves, constructed from decrement functions, were used to estimate (1) suppression for on- and low-frequency suppressors, (2) tip-to-tail differences, (3) Q(ERB), and (4) best frequency. Compression, estimated from the slope of functions relating suppression "threshold" to L(2) for off-frequency suppressors, was similar for 500 and 4000 Hz. Tip-to-tail differences, Q(ERB), and best frequency decreased as L(2) increased for both frequencies. However, tip-to-tail difference (an estimate of cochlear-amplifier gain) was 20 dB greater at 4000 Hz, compared to 500 Hz. Q(ERB) decreased to a greater extent with L(2) when f(2)=4000 Hz, but, on an octave scale, best frequency shifted more with level when f(2)=500 Hz. These data indicate that, at both frequencies, cochlear processing is nonlinear. Response growth and compression are similar at the two frequencies, but gain is greater at 4000 Hz and spread of excitation is greater at 500 Hz.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top row: Mean DPOAE (squares) and noise (triangles) levels in dB SPL as a function of suppressor level, L3, in dB SPL. Bottom row: Mean DPOAE decrements (circles) in dB as a function of L3. Left column shows data when f2=500 Hz; right column shows data when f2=4000 Hz. In both cases, L2=40 dB SL, and an on-frequency suppressor (f3) was used (f3=515 and 4100 Hz for f2=500 and 4000 Hz, respectively). Closed symbols represent the transformed data points and the line represents a linear regression fit to the closed symbols. In all cases, error bars represent ±1 s.d. The short vertical dashed lines in the bottom row of panels are drawn at a decrement of 3 dB, which was used as suppression threshold for the construction of STCs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DPOAE and noise levels for the control conditions, in which there was no suppressor. Top: Mean DPOAE (squares) and noise (triangles) levels in dB SPL as a function of L2 in dB SL when f2=500 Hz. Bottom: Mean DPOAE (squares) and noise (triangles) levels in dB SPL as a function of L2 in dB SL when f2=4000 Hz. In both panels, error bars represent ±1 s.d.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean DPOAE decrements in dB as a function of L3 in dB SPL when f2=500 Hz and L2=30 dB SL. Error bars represent ±1 s.d. Suppressor frequency is indicated within each panel. Closed symbols represent the transformed data to which a linear regression, represented by the solid line, was fit. The short vertical dashed lines in each panel are drawn at a decrement of 3 dB, which was used as suppression threshold for the construction of STCs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean DPOAE decrements in dB as a function of L3 in dB SPL when f2=4000 Hz and L2=30 dB SL. Error bars represent ±1 s.d. Suppressor frequency is indicated within each panel. Closed symbols represent the transformed data to which a linear regression, represented by the solid line, was fit. The short vertical dashed lines in each panel are drawn at a decrement of 3 dB, which was used as suppression threshold for the construction of STCs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean slopes of the decrement-vs-L3 functions as a function of f3 for f2=500 Hz (circles) and f2=4000 Hz (triangles). Data are plotted on a log frequency scale in the left column and a relative (octave) frequency scale in the right column.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean suppression tuning curves, in which the L3 for 3 dB of suppression is plotted as a function of f3, following the conventions used in Fig. 5.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Slopes of the decrement functions as a function of f3, based on multiple linear regression in which L2 and L3 were included in the regression analysis. Open symbols represent the slopes of the decrement-vs-L3 functions and closed symbols represent the slope of the decrements vs L2. Circles represent data when f2=500 Hz and triangles represent data when f2=4000 Hz.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mean STCs for 500 and 4000 Hz. Top: STCs constructed using simple linear regressions that were fit to the decrement-vs-L3 functions. Bottom: STCs constructed using multiple linear regressions that were fit to the decrement-vs-L3 functions. Within each panel, L2 increases from the STC with the lowest suppression threshold to the highest. Superimposed in both panels are the mean behavioral thresholds (closed circles) for all the f2 and f3 frequencies used in the present study.
Figure 9
Figure 9
L3 for 3 dB of suppression as a function of L2 (dB SL) for on-frequency (closed squares) and low-frequency (open squares) suppressors. The low-frequency suppressor was approximately 1 octave below f2. Top and bottom rows show results for simple and multiple linear regressions, respectively. Left and right columns show data for f2=500 Hz and f2=4000 Hz, respectively. The lines represent linear fits to each set of data. Slopes of these lines are provided as insets adjacent to the line to which they apply.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Tip-to-tail difference (in dB) as a function of L2 (dB SL) when f2=500 Hz (open circles) and when f2=4000 Hz (closed circles). Top and bottom panels show the results for simple and multiple linear regressions, respectively.
Figure 11
Figure 11
QERB as a function of L2 (dB SL) following the conventions used in Fig. 10.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Best frequency in octaves (re: f2) as a function of L2 (dB SL), following the conventions used in Figs. 1011. The dashed line is drawn at 0 octaves relative to f2 and provides a point of reference.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Tip-to-tail difference as a function of QERB, following the convention used in Figs. 101112. Circles represents data for 500 Hz and triangles represent data for 4000 Hz. For both frequencies, the point with the lowest tip-to-tail difference∕QERB represents results for the highest L2 level (50 dB SL at both frequencies) and the points with the largest QERB∕tip-to-tail difference represent results for the lowest L2 levels (20 dB SL at 500 Hz and 10 dB SL at 4000 Hz). Lines in each panel (SLR and MLR) represent linear fits to the data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdala, C. (1998). “A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2fl-f2) suppression in humans,” Hear. Res. HERED310.1016/S0378-5955(98)00073-2 21, 125–138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdala, C. (2001). “Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary levels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN10.1121/1.1388018 110, 1465–1476. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdala, C., Sininger, Y. S., Ekelid, M., and Zeng, F.-G. (1996). “Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates,” Hear. Res. HERED310.1016/0378-5955(96)00056-1 98, 38–53. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American National Standards Institute (1996). “Specifications for audiometers,” ANSI S3.6-1996, New York.
    1. Cooper, N. P., and Rhode, W. S. (1995). “Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea,” Hear. Res. HERED310.1016/0378-5955(94)00180-X 82, 225–243. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types