Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Apr 9;299(14):1678-89.
doi: 10.1001/jama.299.14.1678.

Effect of lower targets for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol on atherosclerosis in diabetes: the SANDS randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of lower targets for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol on atherosclerosis in diabetes: the SANDS randomized trial

Barbara V Howard et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: Individuals with diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but more aggressive targets for risk factor control have not been tested.

Objective: To compare progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in adults with type 2 diabetes treated to reach aggressive targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 70 mg/dL or lower and systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 115 mm Hg or lower vs standard targets of LDL-C of 100 mg/dL or lower and SBP of 130 mm Hg or lower.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized, open-label, blinded-to-end point, 3-year trial from April 2003-July 2007 at 4 clinical centers in Oklahoma, Arizona, and South Dakota. Participants were 499 American Indian men and women aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and no prior CVD events.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to aggressive (n=252) vs standard (n=247) treatment groups with stepped treatment algorithms defined for both.

Main outcome measures: Primary end point was progression of atherosclerosis measured by common carotid artery intimal medial thickness (IMT). Secondary end points were other carotid and cardiac ultrasonographic measures and clinical events.

Results: Mean target LDL-C and SBP levels for both groups were reached and maintained. Mean (95% confidence interval) levels for LDL-C in the last 12 months were 72 (69-75) and 104 (101-106) mg/dL and SBP levels were 117 (115-118) and 129 (128-130) mm Hg in the aggressive vs standard groups, respectively. Compared with baseline, IMT regressed in the aggressive group and progressed in the standard group (-0.012 mm vs 0.038 mm; P < .001); carotid arterial cross-sectional area also regressed (-0.02 mm(2) vs 1.05 mm(2); P < .001); and there was greater decrease in left ventricular mass index (-2.4 g/m(2.7) vs -1.2 g/m(2.7); P = .03) in the aggressive group. Rates of adverse events (38.5% and 26.7%; P = .005) and serious adverse events (n = 4 vs 1; P = .18) related to blood pressure medications were higher in the aggressive group. Clinical CVD events (1.6/100 and 1.5/100 person-years; P = .87) did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Reducing LDL-C and SBP to lower targets resulted in regression of carotid IMT and greater decrease in left ventricular mass in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Clinical events were lower than expected and did not differ significantly between groups. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether these improvements will result in lower long-term CVD event rates and costs and favorable risk-benefit outcomes.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00047424.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Participant Flow in SANDS
Figure 2
Figure 2. Panel A. Mean (SD) LDL cholesterol by treatment group (vertical axis) at 3-month intervals (horizontal axis) throughout the study. Panel B. Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure (vertical axis) by treatment group at 3-month intervals throughout the study
Note. LDL values were obtained from capillary blood using Cholestech apparatus. For 2292 samples having both laboratory and Cholestech measures, the means (SD) were 89.2 (31.2) and 87.9 (29.1) mg/dL, respectively
Figure 3
Figure 3. Categorical Changes in IMT Mean (a) and LVMI (b) by Randomization Group
N for IMT data is 469, p-value <.0001. N for LVMI is 445, p-value = .25. No change category was defined as ± 0.01 mm for IMT or ± 0.5 gm/m2.7 for LVMI.

Comment in

References

    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: The Framingham Study. Diabetes Care. 1979;2:120–126. - PubMed
    1. Kleinman JC, Donahue RP, Harris MI, et al. Mortality among diabetics in a national sample. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:389–401. - PubMed
    1. Butler WJ, Ostrander LD, Can11an WJ, et al. Mortality from coronary heart disease in the Tecumseh Study: Long-term effect of diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance and other risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:541–547. - PubMed
    1. Howard BV. Macrovascular complications of diabetes mellitus. In: LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefs JM, editors. Diabetes Mellitus. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1996. pp. 792–797.
    1. Klein R. Kelly West Lecture 1994: Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:258–268. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data