Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Jun;23(6):794-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0609-x. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

Computer-assisted provision of emergency contraception a randomized controlled trial

Eleanor Bimla Schwarz  1 , Barbara Gerbert, Ralph Gonzales
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Computer-assisted provision of emergency contraception a randomized controlled trial

Eleanor Bimla Schwarz et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Emergency contraception (EC) can prevent unintended pregnancy. However, many women continue to lack information needed to use EC effectively and clinician time to counsel women about EC is limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether computer-assisted provision of EC can increase knowledge and use of EC among women able to access EC without a prescription.

Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which the intervention group received a 15-minute computerized educational session and 1 pack of EC. The control group received education about periconception folate supplementation, but no information about EC. Participants were contacted 7 months after enrollment.

Participants: Four hundred forty-six women recruited from 2 urgent care clinics in San Francisco in 2005.

Measurements: Knowledge of EC, use of EC, and self-reported pregnancy.

Results: At follow-up, women in the intervention group answered an average of 2 more questions about EC correctly than they had at baseline, whereas women in the control group answered only 1 more item correctly (2.0 vs 1.2, p < .001). There was a trend toward more use of EC during the study period in the intervention group (10% vs 4% of women followed, p = .06; 6% vs 3%, p = .09 of women enrolled). Fewer women in the intervention group were pregnant at the time of follow-up (0.8% vs 6.5%, p = .01 of women followed; 0.5% vs 4.0%, p = .01 of women enrolled).

Conclusions: Computer-assisted provision of EC in urgent care waiting areas increased knowledge of EC in a state where EC had been available without a prescription for 3 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society, and Abortion Worldwide. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sharing.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2008.
    1. Prine L. Emergency contraception, myths and facts. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(1):127–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trussell J, Stewart F, Guest F, Hatcher RA. Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24(6):269–73. doi: 10.2307/2135857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polis CB, Schaffer K, Blanchard K, Glasier A, Harper CC, Grimes DA. Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 (2):CD005497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raymond EG, Trussell J, Polis CB. Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(1):181–8. - PubMed

Publication types