Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991:131:233-41.

Comparative study of midazolam and diazepam in premedication of bronchoscopy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1840344
Clinical Trial

Comparative study of midazolam and diazepam in premedication of bronchoscopy

V Kolek et al. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1991.

Abstract

Two types of benzodiazepines were used in premedication of flexible bronchoscopy. The agents were introduced in randomized, double-blind trial. Midazolam (Dormicum Hoffmann-La Roche AG) was given to 21 patients (0.07 mg/kg i.v.), diazepam (Seduxen Richter) to 22 patients (0.14 mg/kg i.v.) and placebo (saline) to 20 patients (0.07 ml/kg i.v.). Vigility, motor functions and anxiety were estimated from the application to 3 hours after endoscopy. Breathing, pulse rate, blood pressure and local reactions were followed as well. The course of bronchoscopy, anterograde amnesia and acceptability of further intervention were evaluated. Midazolam offered short term action, stronger sedative and anxiolytic effect than diazepam (48% to 27%). The anterograde amnesia was more frequent (90.5% to 55% in diazepam), acceptability of further bronchoscopy after midazolam was present in 95% of patients, after diazepam in 86% of patients. These favourable properties can be utilized especially in cases with enhanced anxiety and necessity of further endoscopies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by