Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 18405352
- PMCID: PMC2323374
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-0179-4-9
Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: The benefits of Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) for humans with mental disorders have been well-documented using cats and dogs, but there is a complete lack of controlled studies using farm animals as therapeutic agents for psychiatric patients. The study was developed in the context of Green care, a concept that involves the use of farm animals, plants, gardens, or the landscape in recreational or work-related interventions for different target groups of clients in cooperation with health authorities. The present study aimed at examining effects of a 12-week intervention with farm animals on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life among adult psychiatric patients with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses.
Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial and follow-up. Ninety patients (59 women and 31 men) with schizophrenia, affective disorders, anxiety, and personality disorders completed questionnaires to assess self-efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale; GSE), coping ability (Coping Strategies Scale), and quality of life (Quality of Life Scale; QOLS-N) before, at the end of intervention, and at six months follow-up. Two-thirds of the patients (N = 60) were given interventions; the remaining served as controls.
Results: There was significant increase in self-efficacy in the treatment group but not in the control group from before intervention (SB) to six months follow-up (SSMA), (SSMA-SB; F1,55 = 4.20, p= 0.05) and from end of intervention (SA) to follow-up (SSMA-SA; F1,55 = 5.6, p= 0.02). There was significant increase in coping ability within the treatment group between before intervention and follow-up (SSMA-SB = 2.7, t = 2.31, p = 0.03), whereas no changes in quality of life was found. There were no significant changes in any of the variables during the intervention.
Conclusion: AAT with farm animals may have positive influences on self-efficacy and coping ability among psychiatric patients with long lasting psychiatric symptoms.
References
-
- Hassink J, van Dijk M. Farming for health: green carefarming across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.
-
- Lenhard J, Moevius R, Dabbert S. Struktur und Organisationsformen von Therapie- und Betreuungseinrichtung in der Landwirtschaft – eine explorative Studie. Berichte der Landwirtschaft. 1997;75:459–485.
-
- Mallon GP. Cow as co-therapist: utilization of farm animals as therapeutic aides with children in residential treatment. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal. 1994;11:455–474. doi: 10.1007/BF01876570. - DOI
-
- Vadnal K. In: Farming for Health. Green-Care Farming Across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series. Hassink J, van Dijk M, editor. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. Farming for health in Slovenia; pp. 249–269.
-
- Wiesinger G. Forschungsbericht Nr. 28. Wien: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen; 1991. Irrsinn und Landleben: Modelle einer Behindertenintegration in der Landwirtschaft.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
