Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 11:4:9.
doi: 10.1186/1745-0179-4-9.

Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial

Bente Berget et al. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: The benefits of Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) for humans with mental disorders have been well-documented using cats and dogs, but there is a complete lack of controlled studies using farm animals as therapeutic agents for psychiatric patients. The study was developed in the context of Green care, a concept that involves the use of farm animals, plants, gardens, or the landscape in recreational or work-related interventions for different target groups of clients in cooperation with health authorities. The present study aimed at examining effects of a 12-week intervention with farm animals on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life among adult psychiatric patients with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses.

Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial and follow-up. Ninety patients (59 women and 31 men) with schizophrenia, affective disorders, anxiety, and personality disorders completed questionnaires to assess self-efficacy (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale; GSE), coping ability (Coping Strategies Scale), and quality of life (Quality of Life Scale; QOLS-N) before, at the end of intervention, and at six months follow-up. Two-thirds of the patients (N = 60) were given interventions; the remaining served as controls.

Results: There was significant increase in self-efficacy in the treatment group but not in the control group from before intervention (SB) to six months follow-up (SSMA), (SSMA-SB; F1,55 = 4.20, p= 0.05) and from end of intervention (SA) to follow-up (SSMA-SA; F1,55 = 5.6, p= 0.02). There was significant increase in coping ability within the treatment group between before intervention and follow-up (SSMA-SB = 2.7, t = 2.31, p = 0.03), whereas no changes in quality of life was found. There were no significant changes in any of the variables during the intervention.

Conclusion: AAT with farm animals may have positive influences on self-efficacy and coping ability among psychiatric patients with long lasting psychiatric symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hassink J, van Dijk M. Farming for health: green carefarming across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.
    1. Lenhard J, Moevius R, Dabbert S. Struktur und Organisationsformen von Therapie- und Betreuungseinrichtung in der Landwirtschaft – eine explorative Studie. Berichte der Landwirtschaft. 1997;75:459–485.
    1. Mallon GP. Cow as co-therapist: utilization of farm animals as therapeutic aides with children in residential treatment. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal. 1994;11:455–474. doi: 10.1007/BF01876570. - DOI
    1. Vadnal K. In: Farming for Health. Green-Care Farming Across Europe and the United States of America. Wageningen UR Frontis Series. Hassink J, van Dijk M, editor. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. Farming for health in Slovenia; pp. 249–269.
    1. Wiesinger G. Forschungsbericht Nr. 28. Wien: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen; 1991. Irrsinn und Landleben: Modelle einer Behindertenintegration in der Landwirtschaft.