Similar articles

• Incidental findings at surgery. Part 1.

  Schaberg FJ Jr, Doyle MB, Chapman WC, Vollmer CM Jr, Zalieckas JM, Birkett DH, Miner TJ, Mazzaglia PJ. Schaberg FJ Jr, et al. Curr Probl Surg. 2008 May;45(5):325-74. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2008.01.004. Curr Probl Surg. 2008. PMID: 18405691 Review. No abstract available.
• [Incidental findings in connection with computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].

  Dirksen A, Clementsen P, Nørgaard A, Seersholm N, Bach KS. Dirksen A, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Oct 20;170(43):3445; author reply 3445. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008. PMID: 18979670 Danish. No abstract available.
• [Urology imaging: imaging of adrenal incidentaloma].

  Brunaud L, Bresler L, Descotes JL, Joffre F, Hubert J. Brunaud L, et al. Prog Urol. 2003 Nov;13(5):921-30. Prog Urol. 2003. PMID: 14763389 French. No abstract available.
• Definitive characterisation of adrenal lesions.

  Miller JC, Blake MA, Boland GW. Miller JC, et al. BMJ. 2009 Jan 19;338:a3092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3092. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19153128 No abstract available.
• Unusual adrenal incidentalomas: magnetic resonance imaging features with pathological correlation.

  Hoeffel C, Tissier F, Mourra N, Oudjit A, Tubiana JM, Fornes P. Hoeffel C, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):917-25. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000230012.24091.c7. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006. PMID: 17082697 Review.