Quality assurance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiation therapy
- PMID: 18406935
- PMCID: PMC2600917
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.091
Quality assurance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiation therapy
Abstract
Recent advances in radiation delivery techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, provide unprecedented ability to exquisitely control three-dimensional dose distribution. Development of on-board imaging and other image-guidance methods significantly improved our ability to better target a radiation beam to the tumor volume. However, in reality, accurate definition of the location and boundary of the tumor target is still problematic. Biologic and physiologic imaging promises to solve the problem in a fundamental way and has a more and more important role in patient staging, treatment planning, and therapeutic assessment in radiation therapy clinics. The last decade witnessed a dramatic increase in the use of positron emission tomography and computed tomography in radiotherapy practice. To ensure safe and effective use of nuclide imaging, a rigorous quality assurance (QA) protocol of the imaging tools and integration of the imaging data must be in place. The application of nuclide imaging in radiation oncology occurs at different levels of sophistication. Quantitative use of the imaging data in treatment planning through image registration and standardized uptake value calculation is often involved. Thus, QA should not be limited to the performance of the scanner, but should also include the process of implementing image data in treatment planning, such as data transfer, image registration, and quantitation of data for delineation of tumors and sensitive structures. This presentation discusses various aspects of nuclide imaging as applied to radiotherapy and describes the QA procedures necessary for the success of biologic image-guided radiation therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Molecular PET/CT imaging-guided radiation therapy treatment planning.Acad Radiol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1108-33. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 May 8. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19427800 Review.
-
[Image registration for radiation therapy: Practical aspects and quality control].Cancer Radiother. 2006 Sep;10(5):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 4. Cancer Radiother. 2006. PMID: 16890471 Review. French.
-
INVITED REVIEW--IMAGE REGISTRATION IN VETERINARY RADIATION ONCOLOGY: INDICATIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND FUTURE ADVANCES.Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2016 Mar-Apr;57(2):113-23. doi: 10.1111/vru.12342. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2016. PMID: 26777133 Review.
-
Current external beam radiation therapy quality assurance guidance: does it meet the challenges of emerging image-guided technologies?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(1 Suppl):S13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.084. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. PMID: 18406911
-
Quality assurance challenges for motion-adaptive radiation therapy: gating, breath holding, and four-dimensional computed tomography.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(1 Suppl):S103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2386. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. PMID: 18406905
Cited by
-
Image-based biomarkers in clinical practice.Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011 Apr;21(2):157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2010.11.003. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21356483 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COMP Report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiation treatment planning.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Dec;23(12):e13785. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13785. Epub 2022 Oct 8. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 36208131 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical use of positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning - Medical physics considerations.Z Med Phys. 2023 Feb;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Z Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 36272949 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;22:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 Apr. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35493852 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Townsend DW, Carney JP, Yap JT, Hall NC. PET/CT Today and Tomorrow. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004;45:4S–14S. - PubMed
-
- Czernin J, Schelbert H. PET/CT Imaging, Facts, Options, Hopes, and Questions. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004;45:1S–3S.
-
- Vogel WV, Oyen WJ, Barentsz JO, Kaanders JH, Corstens FH. PET/CT: panacea, redundancy, or something in between? J Nucl Med. 2004;45 Suppl 1:15S–24S. - PubMed
-
- Hicks RJ, Kalff V, MacManus MP, Ware RE, Hogg A, McKenzie AF, Matthews JP, Ball DL. (18)F-FDG PET provides high-impact and powerful prognostic stratification in staging newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2001;42(11):1596–1604. - PubMed
-
- Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Ball DL, Kalff V, Matthews JP, Salminen E, Khaw P, Wirth A, Rischin D, McKenzie A. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: powerful correlation with survival and high impact on treatment. Cancer. 2001;92(4):886–895. - PubMed