Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;34(5):382-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.028.

Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment

Gwen L Alexander  1 , George W Divine, Mick P Couper, Jennifer B McClure, Melanie A Stopponi, Kristine K Fortman, Dennis D Tolsma, Victor J Strecher, Christine Cole Johnson
Affiliations

Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment

Gwen L Alexander et al. Am J Prev Med. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: With the growing use of Internet-based interventions, strategies are needed to encourage broader participation. This study examined the effects of combinations of monetary incentives and mailing characteristics on enrollment, retention, and cost effectiveness for an online health program.

Methods: In 2004, a recruitment letter was mailed to randomly selected Midwestern integrated health system members aged 21-65 and stratified by gender and race/ethnicity; recipients were randomly pre-assigned to one of 24 combinations of incentives and various mailing characteristics. Enrollment and 3-month retention rates were measured by completion of online surveys. Analysis, completed in 2005, compared enrollment and retention factors using t tests and chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression modeling assessed the probability of enrollment and retention.

Results: Of 12,289 subjects, 531 (4.3%) enrolled online, ranging from 1% to 11% by incentive combination. Highest enrollment occurred with unconditional incentives, and responses varied by gender. Retention rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with highest retention linked to higher-value incentives. The combination of a $2 bill prepaid incentive and the promise of $20 for retention (10% enrollment and 71% retention) was optimal, considering per-subject recruitment costs ($32 enrollment, $70 retention) and equivalent enrollment by gender and race/ethnicity.

Conclusions: Cash incentives improved enrollment in an online health program. Men and women responded differently to mailing characteristics and incentives. Including a small prepaid monetary incentive ($2 or $5) and revealing the higher promised-retention incentive was cost effective and boosted enrollment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, et al. Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth) Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:53–76. - PubMed
    1. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, et al. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract. 2003;20:83–92. - PubMed
    1. Koo M, Skinner H. Challenges of Internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etter JF, Perneger TV. A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:521–5. - PubMed

Publication types